Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2787622.2787721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Commutative Assessments to Compare Conceptual Understanding in Blocks-based and Text-based Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main approaches: text and graphical programming [14]. Graphical programming is considered to be best suited for beginners, while text programming is more flexible and powerful.…”
Section: B the Thymio Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are two main approaches: text and graphical programming [14]. Graphical programming is considered to be best suited for beginners, while text programming is more flexible and powerful.…”
Section: B the Thymio Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphical programming is considered to be best suited for beginners, while text programming is more flexible and powerful. The most well known graphical programming environments, besides the LEGO one, are Scratch and Blockly [14].…”
Section: B the Thymio Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One facet of the study involved student performance over different concepts and modalities [52], having been exposed to both graphical Snap! and textual Java across the course and completing commutative assessments with parallel questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work looking at the relationship between signs (or more broadly representations) and cognition has delineated the particularities of how representations are bound up with knowledge, learning, tasks and uses [1,11,12,[14][15][16]. Similar work focusing on the design of programming languages has shown how various features of the representation, be they visual [17,18], semantic [19], or syntactic [20], all influence the ease of use of the resulting language.…”
Section: Orienting Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%