Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Design, Conduct, and Evaluate Randomized Controlled Trials with American Indian Communities

Abstract

Purpose and Objectives Academic literature indicates a need for more integration of Indigenous and colonial research systems in the design, implementation, and evaluation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with American Indian communities. In this article, we describe ways to implement RCTs with Tribal Nations using community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles and practices. Intervention Approach We used a multiple case study research design to examine how Tribal Nations and researchers collaborated to develop, implement, and evaluate CBPR RCTs. Evaluation Methods Discussion questions within existing tribal–academic partnerships were developed to identify the epistemologic, methodologic, and analytic strengths and challenges of 3 case studies. Results We identified commonalities that were foundational to the success of CBPR RCTs with Tribal Nations. Long-standing community–researcher relationships were critical to development, implementation, and evaluation of RCTs, although what constituted success in the 3 CBPR RCTs was diverse and dependent on the context of each trial. Respect for the importance of diverse knowledge systems that account for both Indigenous knowledge and colonial science also contributed to the success of the RCTs. Implications for Public Health Tribal–academic partnerships using CBPR RCTs must include 1) establishing trusted CBPR partnerships and receiving tribal approval before embarking on RCTs with Tribal Nations; 2) balancing tribal community interests and desires with the colonial scientific rigor of RCTs; and 3) using outcomes that include tribal community concepts of success as well as outcomes found in standard colonial scientific research practices to measure the success of the CBPR RCTs.

Randomised clinical trial research within Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health services: a qualitative study

“… 16 Using community-based participatory research practices and principles may allow RCTs to be designed in a way that works for Indigenous communities and includes outcomes reflecting community concepts of success. 17 Our research supports the need for participatory and long-term partnerships, with aspirations beyond a single research question. Gaps in research funding due to short funding cycles can make this difficult, requiring commitment from researchers and funding bodies.…”

Native Pathways to Health: A Culturally Grounded and Asset-based CBPR Project Exploring the Health of North Carolina’s American Indian Communities

“…Consistent with recommendations and approaches described in the "North Carolina American Indian Report on Conducting CBPR in American Indian Communities" [4],…”

Rationale, Design, and Methods for Nen Unkumbi/Edahiyedo (“We Are Here Now”): A Multi-Level Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes in a Northern Plains American Indian Reservation Community

“…Over a 6-month period, meetings among the CAB and the research team were held to review and discuss our qualitative and quantitative data on Fort Peck youth from our exploratory study and pilot intervention as well as existing literature on SRH interventions for youth. This series of meetings, in addition to the original direct request from the Fort Peck Tribal Council to Rink to develop and implement a holistic SRH intervention for youth on the reservation, resulted in NE's research design ( Figure 2 ) ( 69 ).…”