Using community-based participatory research and organizational diagnosis to characterize relationships between community leaders and academic researchers

Abstract

Sustaining collaborations between community-based organization leaders and academic researchers in community-engaged research (CEnR) in the service of decreasing health inequities necessitates understanding the collaborations from an inter-organizational perspective. We assessed the perspectives of community leaders and university-based researchers conducting community-engaged research in a medium-sized city with a history of community-university tension. Our research team, included experts in CEnR and organizational theory, used qualitative methods and purposeful, snowball sampling to recruit local participants and performed key informant interviews from July 2011–May 2012. A community-based researcher interviewed 11 community leaders, a university-based researcher interviewed 12 university-based researchers. We interviewed participants until we reached thematic saturation and performed analyses using the constant comparative method. Unifying themes characterizing community leaders and university-based researchers' relationships on the inter-organizational level include: 1) Both groups described that community-engaged university-based researchers are exceptions to typical university culture; 2) Both groups described that the interpersonal skills university-based researchers need for CEnR require a change in organizational culture and training; 3) Both groups described skepticism about the sustainability of a meaningful institutional commitment to community-engaged research 4) Both groups described the historical impact on research relationships of race, power, and privilege, but only community leaders described its persistent role and relevance in research relationships. Challenges to community-academic research partnerships include researcher interpersonal skills and different perceptions of the importance of organizational history. Solutions to improve research partnerships may include transforming university culture and community-university discussions on race, power, and privilege.

Developing population health research priorities in Asian city state: Results from a multi-step participatory community engagement

“…Conversely, researchers would be well served when they attend more to local knowledge and priorities within a specific community context. Unlike studies conducted elsewhere, we did not observe significant mistrust of research where “insider-outsider” group dynamics in the relationship between community and researchers was clearly contrasted [53, 54]. This could be partly explained by the fact that locally, there was no apparent legacy regarding mistreatment in research or research injustice [55].…”

The Veterans Affairs Patient Safety Center of Inquiry—Suicide Prevention Collaborative: Creating Novel Approaches to Suicide Prevention Among Veterans Receiving Community Services

“…These practices also are consistent with the literature on learning collaboratives. [29][30][31] The premise for a learning collaborative is to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice in health care. 31 Figure 1 depicts how this collaborative was developed, and how it supports Objectives 2 and 3.…”

Usage of Machine Learning for Strategic Decision Making at Higher Educational Institutions

“…Academic research has been transformed by information technology due to the rapid, widespread diffusion of electronic papers, digitalization of libraries and journals, web access to information and repositories among other facilities [6]. worldwide, researchers and enterprise leaders collaborate from different perspectives in diverse projects thanks to the capability for remote exchange and communication [16]. the innovative advances on use of data (technical use) and elaboration and presentation of projects (academic use) enhance teachers' curriculum and university's visibility [17].…”