2010
DOI: 10.1177/0011128710388922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Cognitive Interviewing to Explore Causes for Racial Differences on the MAYSI-2

Abstract: Prior research indicated that African American and Caucasian youth respond differently to items on the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument–Version 2 (MAYSI-2), a mental health screening tool used nationwide in juvenile justice systems, thus possibly affecting mental health need identification. To explore the cause for the differences, cognitive interviews were conducted with eight African American and eight Caucasian male juvenile detainees, aged 12 to 16 years, from two Midwestern detention facilities. R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that there is a lack of cultural sensitivity when identifying mental health and substance use disorders for different racial and ethnic groups, resulting in some groups simply being under‐identified despite having these disorders. This possibility has been demonstrated by Cauffman and MacIntosh (), using Rasch Differential Item Functioning, and McCoy (), through cognitive interviewing. However, the findings of this study are akin to results from other studies that delineate by race or ethnicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is possible that there is a lack of cultural sensitivity when identifying mental health and substance use disorders for different racial and ethnic groups, resulting in some groups simply being under‐identified despite having these disorders. This possibility has been demonstrated by Cauffman and MacIntosh (), using Rasch Differential Item Functioning, and McCoy (), through cognitive interviewing. However, the findings of this study are akin to results from other studies that delineate by race or ethnicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, previous research showed that culture could affect language interpretation (McCoy, 2014). It is often easier to fill out questionnaires in one's mother language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the nature of the questions and the underlying concepts were reported to be misunderstood by a number of their indigenous youth, resulting in the likely underreporting of symptoms. McCoy (), investigating this in African American and Caucasian youths in the USA with qualitative methodology, found that if questions were confusing for African American youths, they tended to minimise their responses, withhold information or respond inaccurately. Cauffman and MacIntosh (), also working with young African American offenders, made similar suggestions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the most widely used mental health screening tool in youth justice settings (Cruise et al, ) and has been used in studies in the United States of America (USA; Cauffman, ), Canada (Gretton and Clift, ), Australia (Stathis et al, ), Belgium (Devlieger and Verschuere, ), Romania (Rosan et al, ), Switzerland (Leenarts et al, ), Holland (Colins et al, ) and the United Kingdom (Lennox et al, ), with varying degrees of success. Some research has indicated problems with the application of the MAYSI‐2 in contexts and minority cultures within and outside the USA (Cauffman and MacIntosh, ; Stathis et al, ; McCoy, , ; Colins et al, ; Lennox et al, ). Generally, however, the MAYSI‐2 scales have been found to relate well to validated tools measuring similar constructs, although it has been noted that further evaluation with different populations would be ideal (Grisso et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%