2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2022.103742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using CNN-LSTM to predict signal phasing and timing aided by High-Resolution detector data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
5

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…CNN models consist of an input layer, convolutional layer, pooling layer and output layer. Local perception and weight sharing can be achieved through convolutional processing [41]. CNNs are mainly employed to obtain the spatial features of traffic flow data.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Cnn Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNN models consist of an input layer, convolutional layer, pooling layer and output layer. Local perception and weight sharing can be achieved through convolutional processing [41]. CNNs are mainly employed to obtain the spatial features of traffic flow data.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Cnn Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it is evident that SPaT predictions at a corridor level using both adaptive and actuated signal control have not yet been studied. SPaT predictions have been explored by Islam et al ( 26 ) using detector data but not with connected vehicle data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation of all the studies is that crash events are usually rare and therefore, these studies would only rely on the spatial relationship between crash events and traffic parameters. It has been shown in several studies that the temporal relationship need to be included as well since traffic parameters and signal timing would vary largely throughout the day and even across days 14 16 . Moreover, there are notable shortcomings of these types of police reported crash data such as incorrect reasoning, subjectivism, inaccurate data, etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%