2020
DOI: 10.25046/aj050594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Classic Networks for Classifying Remote Sensing Images: Comparative Study

Abstract: This paper presents a comparative study for using the deep classic convolution networks in remote sensing images classification. There are four deep convolution models that used in this comparative study; the DenseNet 196, the NASNet Mobile, the VGG 16, and the ResNet 50 models. These learning convolution models are based on the use of the ImageNet pretrained weights, transfer learning, and then adding a full connected layer that compatible with the used dataset classes. There are two datasets are used in this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section illustrates the proposed methods' experiments setup and results and compares these proposed methods with previous methods' results in [20] and [21]. This comparison is established according to the OA measurements for each model.…”
Section: The Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This section illustrates the proposed methods' experiments setup and results and compares these proposed methods with previous methods' results in [20] and [21]. This comparison is established according to the OA measurements for each model.…”
Section: The Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 10 offers the comparison based on the OA calculations for the proposed model that utilizes the FC layer and other models mentioned in [20] with both datasets.…”
Section: The Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The models are evaluated using dermoscopy images taken from the HAM10000 dataset. The proposed model is compared with all the ResNet models [35,36] i.e., Resnet18, ResNet50 and ResNet101 in terms of precision, sensitivity, accuracy and F1 Score. Adadelta [37] optimizer is used for evaluation of models using 32 batch size.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%