2016
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2016-1234.ch002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using CIPSI Nodes in Diffusion Monte Carlo

Abstract: Several aspects of the recently proposed DMC-CIPSI approach consisting in using selected Configuration Interaction (SCI) approaches such as CIPSI (Configuration Interaction using a Perturbative Selection done Iteratively) to build accurate nodes for diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) calculations are presented and discussed. The main ideas are illustrated with a number of calculations for diatomics molecules and for the benchmark G1 set.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(123 reference statements)
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…en, the LMCT con guration is included via its . c CASSCF/ANO-L-VDZP calculations with optimal active spaces: CAS (4,6) and CAS(6,10) for CN3 and CN5, respectively. d CASPT2/ANO-L-VDZP calculations with the standard IPEA Hamiltonian and optimal active spaces: CAS(4,6) and CAS(6,10) for CN3 and CN5, respectively.…”
Section: A State-specific Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…en, the LMCT con guration is included via its . c CASSCF/ANO-L-VDZP calculations with optimal active spaces: CAS (4,6) and CAS(6,10) for CN3 and CN5, respectively. d CASPT2/ANO-L-VDZP calculations with the standard IPEA Hamiltonian and optimal active spaces: CAS(4,6) and CAS(6,10) for CN3 and CN5, respectively.…”
Section: A State-specific Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, selected con guration interaction (sCI) methods have demonstrated their ability to reach, for moderate size basis sets, near full CI (FCI) quality energies for small organic and transition metal-containing molecules. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Selecting iteratively the most relevant determinants of the FCI space is an old idea that, to the best of our knowledge, dates back to the pioneering works of Bender and Davidson, 14 and Whi en and Hackmeyer 15 in 1969. Few years later, Huron et al 16 proposed the so-called CIPSI (Con guration Interaction using a Perturbative Selection made Iteratively) approach to complement the variational sCI energy with a second-order Epstein-Nesbet perturbative correction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 Moreover, the mechanism and degree of error compensation of the fixed-node error [49][50][51][52][53] in the ground and excited states are mostly unknown, expect in a few cases. [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] Here, within our Jastrow-free QMC protocol relying on a deterministic construction of nodal surfaces, 40,[62][63][64][65] we report all-electron FN-DMC calculations for the ground and excited states of water (H 2 O) and formaldehyde (CH 2 O) using large Dunning's basis sets including diffuse functions. Our results for these two molecules evidence that one is able to obtain accurate excitation energies with relatively compact trial wave functions built with relatively small one-electron basis sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details about our implementation of pseudopotentials within QMC, we refer the interested readers to Ref. 127.…”
Section: Basismentioning
confidence: 99%