Abstract:A key part of promoting social justice as school psychologists is infusing practice with actions that breakdown systems of inequity and incorporate systems of inclusion. The current manuscript provides a description of applying social justice as a framework in universal programming through child rights education. Additionally, the manuscript describes the use of action research methodology to incorporate a social justice perspective not only in program content but also in program development. Results of this p… Show more
“…A significant body of research literature has documented the social justice practices of school and counseling psychologists, and much of this is situated within the UK and US to date (e.g., Biddanda et al, 2019; Jenkins et al, 2018; Winter & Hanley, 2015). However, most of the findings from this work highlight social justice practice focused on the micro- and meso-levels (e.g., Fisher, 2020; Naser et al, 2020). Public policy advocacy, defined as “the attempt to influence practice, policy and legislation through education, lobbying and communication with legislators and elected officials,” is one way that psychologists engage in macro-level social justice action (Heinowitz et al, 2012, p. 373).…”
For applied psychologists, the goal is to promote positive outcomes among the individuals and groups they serve. Psychological practice takes place within a real-world context, including societal conditions that both harm and support children. Within school and counseling psychology, growing recognition of the impact of society on children has led to efforts to identify social justice as a key framework and set of strategies. Despite the obvious impact of public policy on the lives of children, there is very limited research on pathways and experiences of counseling and school psychologists who are involved in public policy efforts in their capacity as psychologists. This study addresses this gap, interviewing eighteen individuals across the United Kingdom and United States. Key findings include the importance of cultural responsiveness, professional development opportunities, and building and sustaining relationships. Several implications for future research and practice are provided, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary collaboration among those engaged in public policy and social justice efforts.
“…A significant body of research literature has documented the social justice practices of school and counseling psychologists, and much of this is situated within the UK and US to date (e.g., Biddanda et al, 2019; Jenkins et al, 2018; Winter & Hanley, 2015). However, most of the findings from this work highlight social justice practice focused on the micro- and meso-levels (e.g., Fisher, 2020; Naser et al, 2020). Public policy advocacy, defined as “the attempt to influence practice, policy and legislation through education, lobbying and communication with legislators and elected officials,” is one way that psychologists engage in macro-level social justice action (Heinowitz et al, 2012, p. 373).…”
For applied psychologists, the goal is to promote positive outcomes among the individuals and groups they serve. Psychological practice takes place within a real-world context, including societal conditions that both harm and support children. Within school and counseling psychology, growing recognition of the impact of society on children has led to efforts to identify social justice as a key framework and set of strategies. Despite the obvious impact of public policy on the lives of children, there is very limited research on pathways and experiences of counseling and school psychologists who are involved in public policy efforts in their capacity as psychologists. This study addresses this gap, interviewing eighteen individuals across the United Kingdom and United States. Key findings include the importance of cultural responsiveness, professional development opportunities, and building and sustaining relationships. Several implications for future research and practice are provided, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary collaboration among those engaged in public policy and social justice efforts.
“…Child rights education provides a platform for children to learn about the importance of rights in their and their peers' lives (Jones et al, 2019;Naser et al, 2020;Ruiz-Casares et al, 2017). However, there is a gap in the literature: there is little research that specifically investigates the roles of child rights education in the expansion of children's participatory opportunities and empowerment.…”
Section: Scope and Area Of Study: Examining Childhoods And The Call F...mentioning
Globally, we have much to learn about fulfilling international child education rights, particularly in times of crisis, as evidenced during the global COVID-19 pandemic. Although the right of children to know their rights is enshrined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, and other documents, such as the African Charter on Rights and Welfare of the Child, child rights are rarely introduced to children as part of their formal learning experience in school, because children are deemed unable to understand the concepts of rights (and responsibilities) (Alderson, 2008; Jerome, 2018). This lack of child-rights education means children are denied opportunities for empowerment: e.g., awareness and knowledge needed for self-advocacy, advocacy for other children with respect to the ability to claim and exercise their rights (Covell et al., 2017; Wabwile, 2016). Drawing on a case study conducted in Uganda and Canada, this paper discusses how participatory, empowering, multimodal, and contextually-responsive/sensitive approaches to child rights education enables children to engage meaningfully in learning about their rights.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.