2014
DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Changes in Auction Maturity Sectors to Help Identify the Impact of QE on Gilt Yields

Abstract: This article uses a novel way of identifying part of the impact of quantitative easing (QE) on gilt yields, using natural experiments associated with Bank of England announcements about changes in the maturity distribution of future gilt purchases. We find that changes in expected QE purchases had a significant effect on gilt yields following each announcement in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 However, for our study, which focuses on a period defined by short-term 33 E.g. McLaren et al (2014). To circumvent this issue, many studies on UMP effects focus exclusively on the early rounds of UMP announcements, such as the UK QE1 or Fed LSAP1 programmes, arguing that these announcements can confidently be assumed to be fully surprising, see, e.g., Gagnon et al (2011) or Joyce et al (2011).…”
Section: Baseline Surprise Measure: Change In Long-term Bond Futuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 However, for our study, which focuses on a period defined by short-term 33 E.g. McLaren et al (2014). To circumvent this issue, many studies on UMP effects focus exclusively on the early rounds of UMP announcements, such as the UK QE1 or Fed LSAP1 programmes, arguing that these announcements can confidently be assumed to be fully surprising, see, e.g., Gagnon et al (2011) or Joyce et al (2011).…”
Section: Baseline Surprise Measure: Change In Long-term Bond Futuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of quantitative easing is typically estimated through the impact the amounts of purchases have on the term premium of yields (through a reduction in supply of assets), see e.g. Gagnon, Raskin, Remache and Sack (2011); D'Amico and King (2013); McLaren, Banerjee and Latto (2014). QE can also affect the expectations component of the yields through the signalling channel Bauer and Rudebusch (2014), from which we abstract here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key insights have also been gleaned from studies on unconventional polices by other major central banks. Joyce, Lasaosa, Stevens, and Tong (2011), Tong (2012), andMcLaren et al (2014) find a significant impact of the Bank of England's quantitative easing policies on Gilt prices. Krishnamurthy, Nagel, and Vissing-Jorgensen (2015) study the impact of ECB's unconventional policies (LTROs, SMP, OMT) based on an event study approach, aimed at quantifying the contribution of various transmission channels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, as QE policies over time became more widely accepted as part of the central banking toolkit and became more widespread, the surprise element of QE-related announcement may have dissipated (e.g. Meaning and Zhu, 2011;McLaren, Banerjee, and Latto, 2014). It seems fair to say, that expectations of further policy action were increasingly priced in by market participants, attenuating the impact of the news at the time of the actual policy announcement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%