2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.08.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using bone fragmentation records to investigate coastal human ecodynamics: A case study from Čḯxwicən (Washington State, USA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Globally, shell middens, that is sites in which discarded mollusc shells are the dominant physical constituent of the deposit, also known as shell-matrix deposits, are typical coastal sites [1–7]. They serve as important archives of past human life, as they contain not only abundant remains of mollusc shell but also provide a chemical and structural environment that protects other archaeological and biological remains [8–10]. Because of this, shell midden sites provide archaeological information on prehistoric and pre-contact hunter-fisher-gatherer and agricultural societies in many coastal landscapes of the world, as well as ecological information about their associated climate and environment [1114].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, shell middens, that is sites in which discarded mollusc shells are the dominant physical constituent of the deposit, also known as shell-matrix deposits, are typical coastal sites [1–7]. They serve as important archives of past human life, as they contain not only abundant remains of mollusc shell but also provide a chemical and structural environment that protects other archaeological and biological remains [8–10]. Because of this, shell midden sites provide archaeological information on prehistoric and pre-contact hunter-fisher-gatherer and agricultural societies in many coastal landscapes of the world, as well as ecological information about their associated climate and environment [1114].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body part representation for bone elements is very similar between the burbot assemblage at Mead C3a and the salmon assemblage at Upward Sun River C3 in being predominantly vertebral (77 and 81%, respectively), with some cranial (22 and 19%, respectively) and ~1% pectoral/pelvic (table S6). Identifiability indices (proxy measures of the degree of bone fragmentation) are also similar between Mead C3a and Upward Sun River C3, including number of specimens (NSP)/NISP (1.9 and 1.7, respectively) and the identification rate ( 30 ) (53.7 and 59.3%, respectively). These similarities in body part representation and fragmentation suggest that similar processing occurred at both sites; however, the Upward Sun River C3 assemblage is mostly burned (93%), while only 1% of the Mead C3a assemblage is burned, suggesting differential disposal strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Archaeologists frequently focus on the tool-assisted extraction of fats deposited within the skeleton of terrestrial herbivores because this practice sets humans apart from most other species, which use their teeth and/or digestive enzymes to dislodge this valuable resource. However, distinguishing tool-assisted fat extraction from other agents of bone fragmentation such as carnivores, trampling, fire, and weathering poses an interpretive challenge as a result of sometimes significant overlap in their respective archaeological signatures (Bovy et al 2019; Castel et al 2017; Costamagno et al 2005; Heinrich 2014; Lam et al 2003; Manne et al 2006; Morin and Soulier 2017; Munro and Bar-Oz 2005; Outram 2001; Pavao-Zuckerman 2011; Sunseri 2015). The interpretation of faunal assemblages is further complicated by the fact that these agents of fragmentation are not mutually exclusive, and they can collectively modify markers of tool-assisted extraction of fats.…”
Section: Tool-assisted Extraction Of Skeletal Fatsmentioning
confidence: 99%