“…[46] In conclusion, Table 4 demonstrates that a large number of laboratory test procedures have been used to validate SFE component calculations, including binder pull-off and peeling tests, mastic cohesion strength and adhesion tests, asphalt mixture tensile tests, stiffness, dynamic modulus and fatigue tests, rolling bottle and boiling water tests. In some cases, very good relations between predicted water sensitivity levels, based on the SFE concept and measured performances were obtained, [15,20,26,[28][29][30]40,51], while in other cases relations were less good or even nonexistent as reported in [22,41,46,53,55]. It is clear that SFE parameters are important, but the overview of findings suggests that very often other properties need to be included when estimating the moisture susceptibility in laboratory tests or in practice.…”