2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-008-0934-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using bomb radiocarbon analyses to validate age and growth estimates for the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, in the western North Atlantic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
71
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Natanson et al (2008) reported a difference in growth band counts along an individual vertebral column in the basking shark, a phenomenon that was conspicuous in large sharks and also affects longevity estimates. Therefore, longevity estimates should be validated using techniques such as bomb radiocarbon chronology and tag-recapture analyses (Smith et al 2003;Francis et al 2007;Kneebone et al 2008).…”
Section: Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Natanson et al (2008) reported a difference in growth band counts along an individual vertebral column in the basking shark, a phenomenon that was conspicuous in large sharks and also affects longevity estimates. Therefore, longevity estimates should be validated using techniques such as bomb radiocarbon chronology and tag-recapture analyses (Smith et al 2003;Francis et al 2007;Kneebone et al 2008).…”
Section: Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistency in location of vertebral sampling is important not only for calculating the relationship between vertebral dimension and body length (Natanson et al 2006, Piercy et al 2006) but also for comparison of band pair count. Though many studies have shown that band pair counts are consistent along the vertebral column (Natanson et al 2002, Joung et al 2004, Kneebone 2005, Bishop et al 2006, Piercy et al 2006 unpubl. data), the results of those studies that do show a difference highlight the need to examine band pair counts along the column of every species aged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite tiger sharks having a global distribution, vertebral ageing studies of the species have thus far been conducted in Hawaii (De Crosta et al, 1984), the western North Atlantic (Kneebone et al, 2008), the Gulf of Mexico , and off the east coast of South Africa (Wintner and Dudley, 2000). Tiger shark growth has also been assessed through the use of mark-recapture methods in Hawaii (Meyer et al, 2014), western North Atlantic (Natanson et al, 1999;Kneebone et al, 2008), Western Australia (Wirsing et al, 2006), and off Brazil (Afonso et al, 2012), although low rates of recapture and a lack of representation of the species' full size range are generally limiting features of these studies (Meyer et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Tiger Shark (Galeocerdo Cuvier )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tiger shark growth has also been assessed through the use of mark-recapture methods in Hawaii (Meyer et al, 2014), western North Atlantic (Natanson et al, 1999;Kneebone et al, 2008), Western Australia (Wirsing et al, 2006), and off Brazil (Afonso et al, 2012), although low rates of recapture and a lack of representation of the species' full size range are generally limiting features of these studies (Meyer et al, 2014). Despite the ageing methods used, modelled estimates of the growth coefficient, k, and asymptotic total length, L ∞ , appear to be markedly different for tiger sharks in different regions of the world.…”
Section: The Tiger Shark (Galeocerdo Cuvier )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation