2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using BMEcat Catalogs as a Lever for Product Master Data on the Semantic Web

Abstract: Abstract. To date, the automatic exchange of product information between business partners in a value chain is typically done using Business-toBusiness (B2B) catalog standards such as EDIFACT, cXML, or BMEcat. At the same time, the Web of Data, in particular the GoodRelations vocabulary, offers the necessary means to publish highly-structured product data in a machine-readable format. The advantage of the publication of rich product descriptions can be manifold, including better integration and exchange of inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is based on a service hub that allows data exchange and data transformation, and separates between a certain and uncertain knowledge repository. Stolz et al presented another integration-focused approach [33]. This work consisted of a transformation from the standard catalogue format BMEcat to the already mentioned GoodRelations ontology.…”
Section: Semantic Technologies and Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is based on a service hub that allows data exchange and data transformation, and separates between a certain and uncertain knowledge repository. Stolz et al presented another integration-focused approach [33]. This work consisted of a transformation from the standard catalogue format BMEcat to the already mentioned GoodRelations ontology.…”
Section: Semantic Technologies and Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those files were converted into JSON-LD syntax since both RDF/XML and JSON-LD are capable to serialize an RDF graph. The translation was done using the RDF Translator [27]. The frame shown in Listing 6 was used together with a translated CIM Profile as an input to the Extended Framing Algorithm.…”
Section: The Rdfs Test Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of catalog group hierarchies considered in the context of this paper are proprietary product taxonomies like the Google product taxonomy [16] and the productpilot category system [17] (the proprietary category structure of a subsidiary of Messe Frankfurt), as well as product categories transmitted via catalog exchange formats like BMEcat 6 [18]. The latter can take advantage of both product categorization standards and catalog group structures in order to organize types of products and services and to contribute additional granularity in terms of semantic descriptions [19].…”
Section: Proprietary Product Category Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%