2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvn.2018.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using bioelectrical impedance analysis to compare the treatment of edema with the Unna's boot and noncompression in individuals with venous ulcers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assessment will be performed by evaluating the total proportion of completely closed wounds relative to that of the start of treatment. Although studies have shown good results with granulation tissue formation and wound healing,11 16 the effectiveness is currently unclear. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of the Unna boot on wound healing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assessment will be performed by evaluating the total proportion of completely closed wounds relative to that of the start of treatment. Although studies have shown good results with granulation tissue formation and wound healing,11 16 the effectiveness is currently unclear. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of the Unna boot on wound healing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Not only does the Unna boot maintain the necessary amount of compression needed to reduce extremity edema, but it also promotes rapid development of granulation tissue and wound healing. 12,13 The application of an Unna boot can be modified to correctly fit the unique shape of the BKA residual limb to create the compression needed to control phlebolymphedema and dehisced wounds. Accordingly, the authors describe herein the following approach to treat dehisced BKA incision sites: a modified Unna boot.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%