2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0218488516500045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Binary Trees for the Evaluation of Influence Diagrams

Abstract: This paper proposes the use of binary trees for representing and managing the potentials involved in Influence Diagrams. This kind of tree allows representing context-specific independencies that are finer-grained compared to those encoded using other representations. This enhanced capability can be used to improve the efficiency of the inference algorithms used for Influence Diagrams. Moreover, binary trees allow computing approximate solutions when exact inference is not feasible. In this work we describe ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this operation, any algorithm involving the use of approximate potentials will become approximate as well, and will ultimately offer nonexact solutions. This is helpful, since for very complex problems it is always better to have at least one approximate solution (see References [23][24][25][26] as examples of approximation with PTs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With this operation, any algorithm involving the use of approximate potentials will become approximate as well, and will ultimately offer nonexact solutions. This is helpful, since for very complex problems it is always better to have at least one approximate solution (see References [23][24][25][26] as examples of approximation with PTs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of this problem is evidenced by previous attempts to obtain alternative structures to 1DAs. Two examples of alternative approaches are standard and binary probability trees (PTs and BPTs) 20–26 . These structures can capture context‐specific independencies 20 and save memory space when repeated values appear under certain circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jensen and Dittmer (1994) developed an efficient algorithm to compute IDs, using BNs, which uses a strong JT with a special propagation scheme to calculate expected utilities. Cabanas et al (2016) exploited context-specific independencies for inference by encoding the parameters of IDs in tree structures. Lazy propagation (Cabanas et al, 2013, Madsen and Jensen, 1999, Madsen and Nilsson, 2001) and sampling based approximate algorithms (Cano et al, 2006) have also been used to compute large IDs efficiently.…”
Section: Influence Diagrams (Ids)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And another approaches have been explored over the years in the search for efficient alternative representations to 1DAs, which are able to work with complex models. Successful examples are standard and binary probability trees (PTs and BPTs) [9][10][11][12][13]. Despite the advantages that these offer compared to the use of 1DA, they also present certain limitations, and not all context-specific independences can result in smaller representations and therefore in memory space savings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%