2015
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2015.2498313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Benchmarks for Radiation Testing of Microprocessors and FPGAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section presents an analysis of the implementation results and describes the results of timing and fault injection performance experiments performed on TCLS-based design, TCLS design. We selected benchmark applications performing matrix multiplications, which are widely used in real-life applications [18], to evaluate the timing and fault-injection performance of the proposed TCLS approach. Within each benchmark application, several matrix multiplication operations are performed, in a bare-metal environment, on different The Unhardened Design version will run its applications on CPU0 only.…”
Section: Implementation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section presents an analysis of the implementation results and describes the results of timing and fault injection performance experiments performed on TCLS-based design, TCLS design. We selected benchmark applications performing matrix multiplications, which are widely used in real-life applications [18], to evaluate the timing and fault-injection performance of the proposed TCLS approach. Within each benchmark application, several matrix multiplication operations are performed, in a bare-metal environment, on different The Unhardened Design version will run its applications on CPU0 only.…”
Section: Implementation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This benchmark was selected for compliance with current efforts towards a common set of benchmarks that can be used for comparison among different experiments [18]. It also includes a set of pre-generated input vectors that were designed by the ATPG community to fully cover the functionality of the circuit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System and Micro-architecture Metrics We characterize the system and micro-architectural behaviors [40] of the data motifs, which are significant for design and optimization [36]. For system evaluation, we report the metrics of CPU utilization, I/O Wait, disk For micro-architectural evaluation, we use the Top-Down analysis method [44], which categorizes the pipeline slots into four categories, including retiring, bad speculation, frontend bound and backend bound.…”
Section: Experiments Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%