Using beam-offset optical coherence tomography to reconstruct backscattered photon profiles in scattering media

Abstract

Raster scanning imaging technologies capture least scattered photons (LSPs) and reject multiple scattered photons (MSPs) in backscattered photons to image the underlying structures of a scattering medium. However, MSPs can still squeeze into the images, resulting in limited imaging depth, degraded contrast, and significantly reduced lateral resolution. Great efforts have been made to understand how MSPs affect imaging performance through modeling, but the techniques for visualizing the backscattered photon profile (BSPP) in scattering media during imaging are unavailable. Here, a method of reconstructing BSPP is demonstrated using beam-offset optical coherence tomography (OCT), in which OCT images are acquired at offset positions from the illumination beam. The separation of LSPs and MSPs based on the BSPP enables quantification of imaging depth, contrast, and lateral resolution, as well as access to the depth-resolved modulated transfer function (MTF). This approach presents great opportunities for better retrieving tissue optical properties, correctly interpreting images, or directly using MTF as the feedback for adaptive optical imaging.

Corneal Imaging Techniques for Dry Eye Disease

“…It exploits the fact that coherent light can be split into two beams by a beam splitter: one beam (the reference beam) travels along a known path length and reflects off a mirror, while the other beam (the sample beam) travels through the tissue of interest and reflects off various structures within it [35]. The two beams are then recombined by another beam splitter and detected by a photodetector [36]. The interference pattern produced by the recombined beams depends on the difference in optical path length between them [37].…”

Spatially offset optical coherence tomography: Leveraging multiple scattering for high-contrast imaging at depth in turbid media

“…A wave-based model of the heterodyne efficiency factor ( 10 , 22 ) provides a framework for exploring the impact of introducing various offset collection geometries. While others have explored similar collection geometries ( 15 , 17 , 23 , 24 ), none have yet adequately described the physics that underpins this collection of techniques (as outlined in Fig. 1).…”