2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icieam.2019.8742909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Battery Energy Storage Systems for Load Balancing and Reactive Power Compensation in Distribution Grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Valley-filling approach to meet charging demands and nodal voltage [18] Voltage unbalance RES and energy storage with optimal scheduling Optimal scheduling uing energy storage batteries [19] Voltage unbalance and reactive power…”
Section: Charging Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valley-filling approach to meet charging demands and nodal voltage [18] Voltage unbalance RES and energy storage with optimal scheduling Optimal scheduling uing energy storage batteries [19] Voltage unbalance and reactive power…”
Section: Charging Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7 presents the simulation results for each of the simulation cases 1, 3, and 4, considering that the objective of minimization is given by Equation (25), where the renewable generation is operated under nominal conditions. Note that C 2 is not analyzed since it is not typical that batteries are used only for reactive compensation due to its main purpose in electrical networks is to provide active compensation service [42]. The numerical results in Table 7 shows that, (1) comparing C 1 with C 4 , the greenhouse gas emissions of CO 2 are reduced about 8.49% and 8.69% regarding daily operative costs with the inclusion of the battery energy storage systems with apparent power compensation capabilities and, (2) if these results are compared with C 3 , then we observe that the reduction regarding the base case are about 5.55%, and 6.02%, which demonstrates the positive effects of including reactive power capabilities of batteries to improve the grid performance of the distribution networks in relation with greenhouse gas emissions and energy purchasing costs, since additional 2.94%, and 2.67% where reactive power is introduced, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Performance Of the 69-node Test Feedermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uses of renewable power sources are comprehensively performed on-grid and off-grid. A framework is essentially a coordination of production, transmission and circulation which supplies power to purchasers [6]. On-grid and off-grid are the terms which portray the manner in which power is conveyed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%