2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using automatic computation to analyze the rate of shoreline change on the Kenitra coast, Morocco

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Shoreline changes has been analyzed using a variety of different methods and techniques which include field surveys, fixed monitoring stations, Geographic Information System (GIS), satellite remote sensing images, and transect lines techniques e.g., [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Field survey trips to measure the point and transect lines are usually time-and labor-consuming [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shoreline changes has been analyzed using a variety of different methods and techniques which include field surveys, fixed monitoring stations, Geographic Information System (GIS), satellite remote sensing images, and transect lines techniques e.g., [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Field survey trips to measure the point and transect lines are usually time-and labor-consuming [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). It is a straight wave-dominated meso-tidal beach environment aligned about 30° to the NS direction (Moussaid et al, 2015). This coast delimits the Atlantic continental shelf and the subsiding Gharb plain located at the junction between the stable Meseta domain to the south and the Rifian domain to the north.…”
Section: Study Area Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sandy beaches are mostly bordered by 5-20 m-high consolidated eolian dunes with the sediment consisting of medium sand rang-ing between 200 and 370 μm (Madouni, 1997;Benmohammadi et al, 2007) and a gentle foreshore slope of 1-3% (Moussaid et al, 2015). Beaches are interrupted by the Sebou tidal inlet formed by two walls that extend approximately 600 m seaward from the low tide level shoreline (Hakkou et al, 2011).…”
Section: Study Area Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 2, shorelines in the middle of study area change constantly without any apparent rule; especially after 2000, the activities of reclamation are more active than ever [54], which resulted in the regression coefficient being very small. In order to get better results, transects that did not meet the requirements were manually deleted or modified, such as: (a) the coastline of the estuary zone is not continuous, and thus we could not consistently get transects; (b) when the regression coefficient of coastline change rate was less than 0.5, it was replaced by artificial end point rates [52,55,56]. After the above-mentioned selections and corrections, 62 effective transects were retained, and the annual growth rate of coastline corresponding to the control points was obtained.…”
Section: Analysis Of Shoreline Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%