2014
DOI: 10.5694/mja13.11166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using automated text messages to monitor adverse events following immunisation in general practice

Abstract: More than 70% of patients responded by SMS to an SMS query about whether they had any vaccine reactions, with the data received in near real-time. Active surveillance of AEFI using SMS has the capacity to complement existing passive reporting systems, potentially permitting more rapid identification of emerging safety signals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women were just as 186 likely to report fever, headache, fatigue, vomiting, rash, or rigors by SMS or telephone, and 187 no women reported convulsions. Women were just as likely to report having sought medical 188 Previous observational studies support our findings, in that response to SMS often exceeds 210 80% [10,11] and adverse event information can vary when collected by SMS and telephone 211 interview, which is consistent with previous observational studies [11]. Internationally, there 212 is growing evidence supporting the feasibility of SMS as a method of data collection.…”
Section: Events Reported 181supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Women were just as 186 likely to report fever, headache, fatigue, vomiting, rash, or rigors by SMS or telephone, and 187 no women reported convulsions. Women were just as likely to report having sought medical 188 Previous observational studies support our findings, in that response to SMS often exceeds 210 80% [10,11] and adverse event information can vary when collected by SMS and telephone 211 interview, which is consistent with previous observational studies [11]. Internationally, there 212 is growing evidence supporting the feasibility of SMS as a method of data collection.…”
Section: Events Reported 181supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Timely collection of vaccine safety data is necessary in 67 order to identify early warning signals and ensure vaccine quality. 68 69 Some vaccine safety surveillance programs incorporate short message service (SMS) 70 communication to monitor adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) details in near real-71 time [10][11][12][13]. While such methods offer rapid data collection and dissemination of results, to 72 date, no study has investigated the potential differences between SMS and telephone 73 interview data collection methods.…”
Section: Introduction 57mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The conclusions drawn from this study were that active surveillance of adverse events following immunizations using SMS has the capacity to complement existing passive reporting systems and has the potential to identify emerging safety signals more rapidly. See Case Study 1 for additional information on how SMS is being used in Australia to monitor adverse events post immunization.…”
Section: Examples and Case Studies Of Digital Health Uses In Global Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both are Patient-Powered Research Networks (PPRNs), which are part of PCORnet, a national, patient-centered research resource funded by PCORI. 31 Goals for the PPRNs are similar to those for many disease registries, with each network being focused on a specific condition and/or community of interest with an objective of creating a standard database that can be used to address future patient-driven research questions. A hallmark of the PPRNs is to include patients as partners in the governance structure of the network and to collect patient-reported outcomes relevant to the community they serve to support patient-prioritized PCOR questions.…”
Section: Challenges In Developing and Operating Patient-centric Regismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation