2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tgie.2019.150640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using artificial intelligence to improve adequacy of inspection in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All it means is that the endoscopist has met the expectations of the AI-based classifiers. What eventually is needed are trials that show that AI-based techniques implemented during colonoscopy lower the incidence, morbidity and mortality of CRC [20]. Those have been and will continue to be the ultimate indicators of successful CRC prevention; therefore AI assisted systems need to show that their implementation lowers these CRC benchmarks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All it means is that the endoscopist has met the expectations of the AI-based classifiers. What eventually is needed are trials that show that AI-based techniques implemented during colonoscopy lower the incidence, morbidity and mortality of CRC [20]. Those have been and will continue to be the ultimate indicators of successful CRC prevention; therefore AI assisted systems need to show that their implementation lowers these CRC benchmarks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objective measurements of quality of colonoscopy are important to reduce subjective biases and differences among endoscopists [19]. We focus on three key measures of quality of colonoscopy [20]: the amount of blurry (non-informative) images during the withdrawal phase, the quality of bowel preparation by patients prior to colonoscopy and the effort to remove remaining debris by the endoscopist, and the quality of the endoscope navigation inside the colon. The latter remains very challenging to solve, but has recently gained more interest due to its significance to the clinical outcome.…”
Section: Analysis For Objective Quality Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 74 , 75 This can be highly valued also in IBD, where the endoscopic assessment can be influenced by operator subjectivity. 76 A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system in use with EC was developed to predict persistent histologic inflammation in UC patients. 47 CAD provided good performance measures, showing sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 74% (95% CI: 65–81%), 97% (95% CI: 95–99%), and 91% (95% CI: 83–95%), respectively.…”
Section: What Is Next: Capsule Endoscopy Artificial Intelligence and Molecular Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of the frames containing abnormalities is also a difficult task because typically only 5% of the frames contain abnormalities [ 8 ]. Several researchers [ 3 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] have suggested different solutions for the automated detection of stomach diseases. However, due to the resemblance of different symptoms including color, shape, texture, etc., it is challenging to accurately classify the type of infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the resemblance of different symptoms including color, shape, texture, etc., it is challenging to accurately classify the type of infection. Most of the previous work was conducted on the detection of a single disease/infection [ 1 , 11 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Accurate classification of four significant diseases (gastritis, esophagitis, peptic ulcers, and bleeding) and healthy images using a single framework is still challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%