2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using artificial intelligence to identify the success window of FLEX strategy under an extended station blackout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the maximum value of the peak cladding temperature remains below the fuel acceptance criterion of 1477.0 K. As the decay heat decreases over time, the cladding temperature begins to decrease as well, demonstrating the effectiveness of the pressurized water reactor's response to beyond-design-basis external events. The PCTs are consistently kept well below the safety limit of 1477K, underscoring the efficacy of pressurized water reactors (PWRs) in coping with LOCA, particularly in light of the successful operation of FLEX equipment (Alketbi and Diab, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the maximum value of the peak cladding temperature remains below the fuel acceptance criterion of 1477.0 K. As the decay heat decreases over time, the cladding temperature begins to decrease as well, demonstrating the effectiveness of the pressurized water reactor's response to beyond-design-basis external events. The PCTs are consistently kept well below the safety limit of 1477K, underscoring the efficacy of pressurized water reactors (PWRs) in coping with LOCA, particularly in light of the successful operation of FLEX equipment (Alketbi and Diab, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This meant that all active safety systems and critical safety functions were unavailable, jeopardizing the safety of the plant. However, critical safety functions could be restored by installing replacement AC power to run the basic equipment, (Alketbi and Diab, 2021). In the aftermath of the Fukushima accident and its implications for public acceptance of nuclear energy, the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) of the United States proposed the concept of Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) and the corresponding FLEX Support Guidelines (FSG) for special accidents caused by external events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fast-running model conditional autoencoder (CAE), known as an auto-associative neural network (AANN), can predict the pressure as well as peak cladding temperature (PCT) in ARP1400 under a small break LOCA (SBLOCA) scenario [6]. Similarly, an ANN model that can also support the implementation of the diverse and fexible coping strategy (FLEX) has been developed for an extended SBO [7,8]. Prediction of the peak cladding temperature (PCT) and infuence of the FLEX strategy for APR1400 undergoing an extended station blackout (SBO) was performed using an artifcial neural network (ANN) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has urged the nuclear community to integrate ML in the industry within the framework of emerging technologies, given its superior capability in handling big-data (IAEA, 2020). In fact, the potential of using ML technology has been explored to estimate some key figures of merit such as the power pin peaking factor (Bae et al, 2008), the wall temperature at critical heat flux (Park et al, 2020), the flow pattern identification (Lin, 2020), to detect anomalies and warn of equipment failure (Ahsan and Hassan, 2013;Chen and Jahanshahi, 2018;Devereux et al, 2019); to determine core configuration and core loading pattern optimization (Siegelmann et al, 1997;Faria and Pereira, 2003;Erdogan and Gekinli, 2003;Zamer et al, 2014;Nissan, 2019), to identify initiating events and categorize accidents (Santosh et al, 2003;Na et al, 2004;Lee and Lee, 2006;Ma and Jiang, 2011;Pinheiro et al, 2020;Farber and Cole, 2020) and to determine of key performance metrics and safety parameters (Ridlluan et al, 2009;Montes et al, 2009;Farshad Faghihi and Seyed, 2011;Patra et al, 2012;Young, 2019;Park et al, 2020;Alketbi and Diab, 2021), and in radiation protection for isotope identification and classification (Keller and Kouzes, 1994;Abdel-Aal and Al-Haddad, 1997;Chen, 2009;Kamuda and Sullivan, 2019), etc. However, it is worth noting that the application of ML in nuclear safety is still limited despite its potential to enhance performance, safety, as well as economics of plant operation (Chai et al, 2003) which warrants further research (Gomez Fernandez et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%