2016
DOI: 10.1080/19320248.2016.1255694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Andersen’s Behavioral Model to Predict Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Among US Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Response options included (1) We could always afford to eat good nutritious meals, (2) We could always afford enough to eat but not always the kinds of food we should eat, (3) Sometimes we could not afford enough to eat and (4) Often we could not afford enough to eat. In accordance with recent studies (32)(33)(34) , respondents who reported that they could sometimes or often not afford enough to eat were designated as experiencing moderate-to-severe food insecurity (2), respondents who reported that they could always afford enough to eat, but could not always afford to purchase nutritious foods, were designated as experiencing mild food insecurity (1) and respondents who reported being consistently able to afford good, nutritious meals were designated as being food secure (0).…”
Section: Independent Variable: Household Food Insecuritysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Response options included (1) We could always afford to eat good nutritious meals, (2) We could always afford enough to eat but not always the kinds of food we should eat, (3) Sometimes we could not afford enough to eat and (4) Often we could not afford enough to eat. In accordance with recent studies (32)(33)(34) , respondents who reported that they could sometimes or often not afford enough to eat were designated as experiencing moderate-to-severe food insecurity (2), respondents who reported that they could always afford enough to eat, but could not always afford to purchase nutritious foods, were designated as experiencing mild food insecurity (1) and respondents who reported being consistently able to afford good, nutritious meals were designated as being food secure (0).…”
Section: Independent Variable: Household Food Insecuritysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Model 3 has a higher proportion of variance in the predicting factors to explain the use of mobile food resources compared to models 1 and 2, (F = 11.61, p < 0.0001, ∆R 2 = 0.38; F = 28.97, p < 0.0001, ∆R 2 = 0.20; F = 18.34, p < 0.0001, ∆R 2 = 0.36, respectively). Model reference: 1 never married, 2 non-Hispanic, 3 White/Caucasian, 4 walk/bicycle, 5 below USD 25,000, 6 not at all important, 7 not expensive, 8 food insecure, 9 disagree. Statistically significant p-values are in bold.…”
Section: Hierarchical Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Lun (2004) [7] utilized Andersen's model to examine how the elderly engage with community-based services such as meal delivery and congregate meals. Other applications include investigating the use of informal food support among low-income households [8] and exploring factors influencing Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit utilization [9]. Furthermore, Sharareh and Wallace (2022) [10] employed the model to highlight the role of nonprofit organizations in comprehending and addressing food insecurity and associated social needs like housing and healthcare issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation