IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/icalt.2004.1357480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using and enhancing a normalized IMS-LD description to support learners in their appropriation of a distance-learning curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IMS-LD's role here will be in providing post-hoc descriptions of learning processes, allowing unplanned sequences of activities to be described and shared in an interoperable manner. The work of Rasseneur, Jacoboni, & Tchounikine (2004) on learners' appropriation of curricula for their own ends is interesting in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMS-LD's role here will be in providing post-hoc descriptions of learning processes, allowing unplanned sequences of activities to be described and shared in an interoperable manner. The work of Rasseneur, Jacoboni, & Tchounikine (2004) on learners' appropriation of curricula for their own ends is interesting in this context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sophistication of this guidance can range from straightforward registration of the learner's progression and reviewing of course requirements to the independent brokering envisaged in the CUBER project (Boursas, Keller, & Magerkurth, 2003). In addition, once definitional data is combined with data on actual learner progression through curricula, a host of new possibilities are opened (Barré, Choquet, Corbière, & Iksal, 2004;Rasseneur, Jacoboni, & Tchounikine, 2004;Tattersall et al, 2005). These include advice on the most efficient path through a flexible curriculum (to support the 'calculating learner'), the path of highest quality (when learners want to get the best results from their learning efforts), or the path along which other peers are available for collaborative study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a separate research strand is needed on visualising routes, positions and "to do lists" for learners, particularly in cases of complex nesting of activity structures and high degrees of optionality. Moreover, additional analysis is needed to confirm IMSLD's role in modelling "emergent routes" (the work of Rasseneur, Jacoboni, & Tchounikine (2004) would seem to confirm this assumption).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%