2019
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using an old test for new tricks: Measuring direct oral anti‐Xa drug levels by conventional heparin‐calibrated anti‐Xa assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were also observed in studies assessing the correlation of anti-Xa measurements with LC-MS/MS in spiked samples ( 27 30 ). A high correlation between UFH-calibrated anti-Xa measurements and rivaroxaban-/apixaban-calibrated anti-Xa results was found in a study assessing 241 left-over samples ( 20 ). Besides, van Pelt and colleagues proposed a universal anti-Xa assay reporting the inhibitory effect rather than drug concentrations ( 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were also observed in studies assessing the correlation of anti-Xa measurements with LC-MS/MS in spiked samples ( 27 30 ). A high correlation between UFH-calibrated anti-Xa measurements and rivaroxaban-/apixaban-calibrated anti-Xa results was found in a study assessing 241 left-over samples ( 20 ). Besides, van Pelt and colleagues proposed a universal anti-Xa assay reporting the inhibitory effect rather than drug concentrations ( 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, these tests are still not widely implemented because it is laborious and expensive to provide three different tests ( 3 ). We and other authors hypothesized that a single heparin-calibrated anti-Xa assay would be sufficient to accurately and efficiently determine rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban drug levels ( 18 20 ). An essential advantage of this method is that heparin-calibrated assays are already available even in smaller laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not require equation or conversion factors in contrast to previous studies proposing tools converting "uncalibrated" anti-Xa assay results into DOAC concentrations. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Secondly, we focused on the lower part of the curve to improve precision up to 100 ng/mL, contrary to most studies. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Noteworthy, we observed a clear exponential relationship between LMWH and DOAC anti-Xa activities in this measuring range and evidenced a much better fit than using a linear relationship reported in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The correlation between heparin-calibrated Anti-Xa activity and apixaban-or rivaroxaban-calibrated anti-Xa assays lies above 96%. 6 Given its accuracy and broader availability across Europe, we chose a cut-off based on the heparin-calibrated Anti-Xa activity. The cut-off of <0.5 U/ml corresponds to low Xa inhibiting NOACs concentrations (<50-100 ng/ml).…”
Section: Dear Editorsmentioning
confidence: 99%