2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13178-021-00533-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using an Intersectional Framework to Understand the Challenges of Adopting Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Young Adult Black Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empowering Black women to make informed, autonomous decisions within their healthcare may help increase PrEP initiation: Guided by intersectionality, [23][24][25] the present study assessed sociostructural in uences on PrEP deliberation and initiation among Black women. Consistent with prior research, 17,31,32 In recent years, HIV prevention researchers have called for research on structural contexts, [33][34][35][36] and Black women in our study described three key structural barriers to PrEP consideration and initiation: costs; limited speci c marketing; and medical distrust. Financial costs have been documented as a deterrent, 32,37 but structural mechanisms such as racial-and gender-related wage gaps 38 and gendered racism 39 have contributed to economic inequalities experienced by Black women.…”
Section: Barriers Of Prep Deliberationsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Empowering Black women to make informed, autonomous decisions within their healthcare may help increase PrEP initiation: Guided by intersectionality, [23][24][25] the present study assessed sociostructural in uences on PrEP deliberation and initiation among Black women. Consistent with prior research, 17,31,32 In recent years, HIV prevention researchers have called for research on structural contexts, [33][34][35][36] and Black women in our study described three key structural barriers to PrEP consideration and initiation: costs; limited speci c marketing; and medical distrust. Financial costs have been documented as a deterrent, 32,37 but structural mechanisms such as racial-and gender-related wage gaps 38 and gendered racism 39 have contributed to economic inequalities experienced by Black women.…”
Section: Barriers Of Prep Deliberationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Their general skepticism in conjunction with experiences of provider bias contributes to medical mistrust and distrust in the healthcare system. Consistent with prior research on PrEP initiation among Black women, 31,32 limited PrEP awareness and low perceived risk perception for HIV acquisition appeared to delay PrEP initiation. Speci cally, Black women who believe they are at low risk for acquiring HIV may view PrEP as unnecessary and thus view themselves as inappropriate candidates for PrEP.…”
Section: Barriers Of Prep Deliberationsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For example, Black women and their communities have experienced violence, discrimination, stigma, and poverty that have disrupted sexual networks, relationship power dynamics and thus thwarted HIV prevention efforts [ 26 , 27 ]. Despite recent calls to address socio-structural factors and PrEP care [ 18 , 30 ], few studies have conceptualized Black women’s experiences related to PrEP within an intersectional framework. Historically rooted in Black feminist theory, intersectionality is a theoretical framework that posits macro-level factors (e.g., racism, sexism, classism) produce multiple interlocking sources of oppression and power, which intersect and impact individuals at the micro-level based on their social identities [ 31 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these actions are not enough. There is a need to incorporate justice paradigms [37], including insights from intersectional feminism and critical race theory [9,[38][39][40], within HIV prevention science to account for the dynamics of power and exploitation that foster inequities embedded within research and better engage with community values on what it means for science to be trustworthy.…”
Section: Paradox 3: Are We Just Guinea Pigs?mentioning
confidence: 99%