2016
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using an interlaboratory study to revise methods for conducting 10‐d to 42‐d water or sediment toxicity tests with Hyalella azteca

Abstract: Studies have been conducted to refine US Environmental Protection Agency, ASTM International, and Environment Canada standard methods for conducting 42-d reproduction tests with Hyalella azteca in water or in sediment. Modifications to the H. azteca method include better-defined ionic composition requirements for exposure water (i.e., >15 mg/L of chloride and >0.02 mg/L of bromide) and improved survival, growth, and reproduction with alternate diets provided as increased rations over time in water-only or whol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
51
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mussels were not fed during the acute exposure, whereas amphipods were fed 0.25 mg of diatoms and 0.5 mg of TetraMin once daily as recommended by ASTM International [24,25] and Ivey et al [27]. Eight beakers per concentration were placed in the diluter, 4 replicate beakers for the mussel test and the other 4 replicate beakers for the amphipod test.…”
Section: Acute Toxicity Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mussels were not fed during the acute exposure, whereas amphipods were fed 0.25 mg of diatoms and 0.5 mg of TetraMin once daily as recommended by ASTM International [24,25] and Ivey et al [27]. Eight beakers per concentration were placed in the diluter, 4 replicate beakers for the mussel test and the other 4 replicate beakers for the amphipod test.…”
Section: Acute Toxicity Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control survival met the chronic mussel test acceptability criterion of control survival of !80% [24]. The control survival of amphipods was 95%, and control dry weight of amphipods was 0.45 mg/individual, meeting the chronic amphipod test acceptability criterion of control survival of !80% and dry weight of 0.35 mg/individual [25,27]. There were no significant differences in mean survival between the control and any treatment of both species; however, mean dry weight was significantly reduced starting in the 300 mg/L treatment for mussels and in the 600 mg/ L treatment for amphipods ( Table 2).…”
Section: Toxicity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of H. azteca was evaluated relative to proposed test acceptability criteria for revisions being considered to ASTM International and USEPA for conducting 42‐d water or sediment exposures with H. azteca tested with 2 new diet rations and with water quality requirements of >15 mg Cl/L and >0.020 mg Br/L . Specifically, the test acceptability criteria were established as 10‐d, 28‐d, and 42‐d survival >80%; 10‐d dry weight >0.050 mg/individual; 28‐d dry weight >0.35 mg/individual; 42‐d dry weight >0.50 mg/individual; and 42‐d young/surviving female >6.0 (Supplemental Data, Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colors indicate test water: orange = Smith reconstituted water; gray = Borgmann reconstituted water; cyan = 100 well water; black = 300 well water. The horizontal line is the 6.0 young/female proposed test acceptability criterion , and the vertical line is the 0.50 mg/individual 42‐d weight test acceptability criterion. Symbols with a red border indicate bromide concentrations <0.020 mg/L.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control organisms in clean sediment grew to an average of 0.762 mg/organism dry weight, indicating that test conditions were suitable to maintain organisms over the 42‐d exposure (i.e., >0.5 mg/organism dry wt in 42 d as proposed as the minimum growth test acceptability criterion for the revised USEPA method ). Final dry weight was significantly greater at the highest sediment Ag concentration (2088 mg/kg dry wt; Figure ); however, this increase was likely attributed to the enhanced food supply per surviving individual.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%