Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Workshop on the Lifelog Search Challenge 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3210539.3210543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using an Interactive Video Retrieval Tool for LifeLog Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Search Engine After a successful participation at the Video Browser Showdown 2018 (1st place), the SIRET team from Charles University, Prague, participated also at the Lifelog search challenge with an updated version of the VIRET system 30) . The objective of the participation was to inspect the performance of a purely contentbased video retrieval tool for Lifelog data.…”
Section: Siret: Viret -An Interactive Lifelogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Search Engine After a successful participation at the Video Browser Showdown 2018 (1st place), the SIRET team from Charles University, Prague, participated also at the Lifelog search challenge with an updated version of the VIRET system 30) . The objective of the participation was to inspect the performance of a purely contentbased video retrieval tool for Lifelog data.…”
Section: Siret: Viret -An Interactive Lifelogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• VIRET [8,9] is a frame-based multi-modal video retrieval system developed at Charles University, Czech Republic. VIRET regularly (and successfully) participates at international interactive multimedia retrieval campaigns.…”
Section: Interactive Video Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar version of liveXplore was deployed for the LSC2019 challenge [10], though not as successfully. Another system of note came from Charles University, Prague, with a repurposed an updated version of the VIRET video retrieval system [12]. Every day from the collection was treated as one 'video' represented by the lifelog images, with automatic annotations associated with each image using GoogleNet.…”
Section: Related Interactive Lifelog Retrieval Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%