2008
DOI: 10.1080/13664530802579926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using an equity audit investigation to prepare doctoral students for social justice leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Skrla et al (2004) recommended the following steps for using equity audits as part of a change process: creating a committee of stakeholders, presenting the data to the committee for them to graph, discussing the meaning of the data (possible use of experts, led by a facilitator), implementing solution(s), monitoring and evaluating results, and celebrating if successful. The equity audit as described by Skrla and colleagues (2004) and Scheurich and Skrla (2003) targets school-based data and data-driven change and has been provided to educational leadership students as a tool for translating social justice leadership theory into practice (Harris & Hopson, 2008). Although equity audits typically focus on K-12 schools or districts, McKinney and Capper (2010) utilized equity audits when conducting a case study of a graduate counseling education program's preparation that included the selection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Skrla et al (2004) recommended the following steps for using equity audits as part of a change process: creating a committee of stakeholders, presenting the data to the committee for them to graph, discussing the meaning of the data (possible use of experts, led by a facilitator), implementing solution(s), monitoring and evaluating results, and celebrating if successful. The equity audit as described by Skrla and colleagues (2004) and Scheurich and Skrla (2003) targets school-based data and data-driven change and has been provided to educational leadership students as a tool for translating social justice leadership theory into practice (Harris & Hopson, 2008). Although equity audits typically focus on K-12 schools or districts, McKinney and Capper (2010) utilized equity audits when conducting a case study of a graduate counseling education program's preparation that included the selection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barbara's district had previously conducted an equity audit, which was reported by her colleague Dawn as the entry point for the district to publicly engage in the work needed to create more equitable spaces. This finding provides additional support to the effectiveness of equity audits being used by individual leaders (Dodman et al, 2019;Harris & Hopson, 2008;Groenke, 2010;Palmer et al, 2009) and adds to the growing findings that principals leading for social justice work to address institutional oppression in collaboration with the district (Wilkerson & Wilson, 2017;Welton, Diem, & Holme, 2015;Shields & Hesbol, 2020).…”
Section: Principals Leading For Social Justice Are Strategicmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Educational leaders must not continue to engage in practices that have resulted in institutional oppression. Instead, educational leaders must question the status quo and lead to transform our schools (Rusch & Horsford, 2008;Harris & Hopson, 2008;Moos, 2010;Khalifa, 2011;Skrla & Scheurich, 2001).…”
Section: Evolution Of Social Justice Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations