2009 10th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed 2009
DOI: 10.1109/snpd.2009.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using an Artificial Neural Network for Predicting Embedded Software Development Effort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third category of prediction methods are supervised algorithms for fault prediction, which are generally divided into two groups: regression and classification. These methods are shown in Figure 10 35,141–160 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The third category of prediction methods are supervised algorithms for fault prediction, which are generally divided into two groups: regression and classification. These methods are shown in Figure 10 35,141–160 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are shown in Figure 10. 35,[141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157][158][159][160] F I G U R E 9 Fuzzy logic system for fault prediction F I G U R E 1 0 Supervised algorithms for prediction…”
Section: 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we investigated the prediction of total effort and errors using an artificial neural network (ANN) (Iwata, Nakashima, Anan, & Ishii, 2008;Iwata, Anan, Nakashima, & Ishii, 2009;Iwata, Nakashima, Anan, & Ishii, 2012, 2013. In earlier papers, we showed that ANN models are superior to regression analysis models for predicting effort and errors in new projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%