2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-017-0641-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using ambient vibration measurements for risk assessment at an urban scale: from numerical proof of concept to Beirut case study (Lebanon)

Abstract: Post-seismic investigations repeatedly indicate that structures having frequencies close to foundation soil frequencies exhibit significantly heavier damages (Caracas 1967; Mexico 1985; Pujili, Ecuador 1996; L' Aquila 2009). However, observations of modal frequencies of soils and buildings in a region or within a current seismic risk analysis are not fully considered together, even when past earthquakes have demonstrated that coinciding soil and building frequencies leads to greater damage. The present paper t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was originally compiled by C. Cornou (Salameh 2016;Salameh et al 2017) and consists of about 600 Japanese KiK-net sites, more than 200 sites from the USA, made available by D. Boore (http://quake.usgs.gov/~boore), and 22 European sites measured during the NERIES project (Di Giulio et al 2012). The main characteristics of this set of site profiles are presented in Salameh (2016), Almakari et al (2016) and Salameh et al (2017): They are primarily usual (i.e., normally soft, with S-wave velocities generally >200 m/s) and stiff soils, with shallow to intermediate thicknesses, <200 m in most cases, with only few sites-about 50-with fundamental frequency below 1 Hz. They generally have "normally hard" to very hard underlying bedrock; the "bedrock" velocity, i.e., the velocity of the underlying half-space, varies from <500 m/s to >3 km/s.…”
Section: Theoretical Derivation Of the Transfer Function T Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was originally compiled by C. Cornou (Salameh 2016;Salameh et al 2017) and consists of about 600 Japanese KiK-net sites, more than 200 sites from the USA, made available by D. Boore (http://quake.usgs.gov/~boore), and 22 European sites measured during the NERIES project (Di Giulio et al 2012). The main characteristics of this set of site profiles are presented in Salameh (2016), Almakari et al (2016) and Salameh et al (2017): They are primarily usual (i.e., normally soft, with S-wave velocities generally >200 m/s) and stiff soils, with shallow to intermediate thicknesses, <200 m in most cases, with only few sites-about 50-with fundamental frequency below 1 Hz. They generally have "normally hard" to very hard underlying bedrock; the "bedrock" velocity, i.e., the velocity of the underlying half-space, varies from <500 m/s to >3 km/s.…”
Section: Theoretical Derivation Of the Transfer Function T Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach as in Salameh et al (2017) was adopted for the estimation of urban seismic damages at the building-level. We use the same dataset of Salameh et al (2017) composed of 887 1-D multi-layered soil profiles from worldwide available profiles, 60 synthetic base rock accelerations ranging from 0.02 to 8.6 m/s 2 mimicking accelerations produced by earthquakes with magnitude ranging from 3 to 7 and epicentral distances from 5 to 100 km.…”
Section: Methods For Estimating Seismic Damages Building By Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach as in Salameh et al (2017) was adopted for the estimation of urban seismic damages at the building-level. We use the same dataset of Salameh et al (2017) composed of 887 1-D multi-layered soil profiles from worldwide available profiles, 60 synthetic base rock accelerations ranging from 0.02 to 8.6 m/s 2 mimicking accelerations produced by earthquakes with magnitude ranging from 3 to 7 and epicentral distances from 5 to 100 km. Finally, 141 Single-Degree Of Freedom (SDOF) oscillators representing different building typologies, namely masonry buildings (Class 1), non-designed reinforced concrete buildings (Class 2) and DCL reinforced concrete buildings (Class 3).…”
Section: Methods For Estimating Seismic Damages Building By Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, such classifications of soil based solely on the average shear-wave velocities for the upper 30 m (VS30) ignore velocity contrasts between soil layers below 30 m, especially in cases of deep sites as Campo de Dalías [4][5][6] which could result in a less accurate determination of elastic response spectra. Moreover, the ratio between the resonant periods and the natural period of the building structures has been demonstrated as an explanatory parameter of damage increment in affected buildings [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%