2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using affinity propagation clustering for identifying bacterial clades and subclades with whole-genome sequences of Francisella tularensis

Abstract: By combining a reference-independent SNP analysis and average nucleotide identity (ANI) with affinity propagation clustering (APC), we developed a significantly improved methodology allowing resolving phylogenetic relationships, based on objective criteria. These bioinformatics tools can be used as a general ruler to determine phylogenetic relationships and clustering of bacteria, exemplary done with Francisella (F.) tularensis. Molecular epidemiology of F. tularensis is currently assessed mostly based on labo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally whole genome sequences of Francisella were analyzed with canSNPer [ 79 ] elucidating a detailed analysis suitable here, although other methods provided useful analysis methods, as described elsewhere [ 91 ]. Reads were mapped to the reference genome with BWA (0.7.17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally whole genome sequences of Francisella were analyzed with canSNPer [ 79 ] elucidating a detailed analysis suitable here, although other methods provided useful analysis methods, as described elsewhere [ 91 ]. Reads were mapped to the reference genome with BWA (0.7.17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Fischer and colleagues successfully assigned RABV and Francisella tularensis isolates into reasonable objectively defined clusters ( Fischer et al. 2018 ; Busch et al. 2020 ), the APC results were partly incongruent with the branching of a RABV phylogenetic tree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The genome sizes were estimated between 1.9-2.2 million bases with approximately 1,980 coding sequences. The programs as used in Busch et al (Busch et al, 2020a;Busch et al, 2020b) were applied with standard settings. No reads mapped to reference genes in the database, therefore, no local assemblies were run and no SNPs were detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%