Using additive manufactured parametric models for wind tunnel test-based aerodynamic shape optimization

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a new approach of using additively manufactured parametric models in the wind tunnel test-based aerodynamic shape optimization (ASO) framework and to present its applicability test results obtained from a realistic aircraft design problem. Design/methodology/approach For aircraft shape optimization, the following three methodologies were used. First, as a validation study, the possibility of using rapid prototyping (RP) model in the wind tunnel test was verified. Second, through the wind tunnel test-based ASO, the application and feasibility of the real fighter aircraft shape optimization were verified. A generic fighter configuration is parameterized to generate various test models using additive manufacturing. Wind tunnel tests are conducted to measure their stability criteria in high angle of attack (AOA). Finally, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study was performed and analysis procedures, costs and results compared to the wind tunnel test were compared and reviewed. Findings RP technology can significantly reduce the time and cost of generating parametric wind tunnel models and can open up new possibilities for wind tunnel tests to be used in the rigorous aerodynamic design loop. There was a slight difference between the results of the RP model and the metallic model because of rigidity and surface roughness. However, the tendency of the aerodynamic characteristics was very similarly predictable. Although there are limitations to obtaining precise aerodynamic data, it is a suitable method to be applied to comparative studies on various shapes with large geo-metric changes in the early phase of design. The CFD analysis indicates that the wind tunnel-based ASO using the RP model shows the efficiency corresponding to the CFD shape optimization. Research limitations/implications The RP parametric models may have various assembly error sources and rigidity problems. The proposed methodology may not be suitable for collecting the accurate aerodynamic database of a final design; rather, the methodology is more suitable to screen out many configurations having fairly large shape variation in the early stage of the design process. Practical implications The wind tunnel test-based ASO can replace or supplement CFD-based ASO. In areas where CFD accuracy is low, such as high AOA flight characteristics, RP model wind tunnel-based ASO can be a research method that can secure both efficiency and accuracy advantages, providing ten times more effective in terms of cost and time. The wind tunnel test is used to obtain aerodynamic data at the final stage of shape design. It can be extended to a comparative study of several shapes in the early design phase. This procedure can be applied for both industrial level and educational aircraft design activities. Originality/value This study is the application to be applied as a parametric study on the whole aircraft, rather than using the RP model applying a simple partial control surface or configuration change of a part of the wing. The possibility of using the RP model was confirmed by comparing and verifying each other in a medium-sized wind tunnel using a relatively large RP model and a metallic model. It was verified that it can be applied in the shape design process, not the shape verification in the traditional design procedure, and a comparison with the CFD method was also performed. With further development and validation efforts, the new design framework may become an industrial standard for future aircraft development.

Design optimization of 3D printed flow path plates in high-performance bioethanol fuel cells

“…It is emphasized that at these current densities, the assumption of water is being produced in the form of mist does not remain valid anymore. Large quantities of water flood the pores of catalyst and membrane, thereby increasing transport resistance (Carcadea et al , 2007; Chi et al , 2006; Zenyuk et al , 2014).…”

“…It is worth mentioning that the current development in 3D printing methodologies has emphasized its applications in various energy devices, FDM printed microfluidic channels, electrochemical properties of cation exchange membrane, parametric models of wind tunnel test-based aerodynamic shape, 3D printing self-breath FC using photo resin, etc. (Chung et al, 2021;Sapkota et al, 2022;Z arybnick a et al, 2021;Zeraatkar et al, 2021). Tai et al (2019) has recently reviewed the application of 3D printing in FC research.…”

“…Performance of a 25 cm 2 active PEMFC using different flow channel geometry has been looked into both numerically and experimentally (Khazaee and Ghazikhani, 2013a). In brief, most of the work reported in the literature, both numerical (Chi et al , 2006; Khazaee and Ghazikhani, 2013a; Muthukumar et al , 2014; Wang et al , 2011; Zenyuk et al , 2014) and experimental (Kahveci et al , 2016; Khazaee and Ghazikhani, 2013a; Ozen et al , 2016; Zenyuk et al , 2014) were mostly carried out on serpentine channels with right-angle corners on a 25 cm 2 standard cell.…”

Analysis of additively manufactured flexible wing model

“…Despite the aforementioned limitations, researchers have successfully taken advantage of AM to facilitate their studies for the different regimes up to the hypersonic speed (Zhu et al , 2019b; Rêgo et al , 2018). Different types of wind tunnel models, such as aircraft (Zhu et al , 2019b; Raza et al , 2021; Chung et al , 2020), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) (Goh, 2017; Junk et al , 2017) and missiles (Aghanajafi and Daneshmand, 2010) models, have been built through AM techniques demonstrating their viability. In fact, the low stiffness or large flexibility might be desirable and more representative of real models (Zhu et al , 2019b).…”

On the design and manufacturing of topologically optimized wings

“…Given the fact that they observed stress values lower than the material strength, they claim that stiffness limits the design more than strength. Chung et al (2020) developed a methodology to optimize aerodynamically aircraft which comprises both aerodynamic shape optimization and rapid prototyping for wind tunnel models to explore the design space, where Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) does allow for accurate predictions. The authors have alerted to surface roughness that can be an issue when aerodynamic performance is sought.…”