2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2005.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using active networks technology for dynamic QoS

Abstract: We propose a dynamic QoS, or D-QoS, model where QoS settings can be automatically reconfigured based upon requests from authorized users. Different levels of privilege can be assigned to users enabling higher privileged users to interrupt the network flows belonging to those of lower privileged levels. To request for a special QoS treatment, a user can issue an active packet to interrupt any active node along its flow path which is D-QoS enabled. The request for a specific interruption level is approved by a D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researches have been done on dynamically allocating network resources to optimize the resource supply for routing services. In (Tansupasiri et al, 2006), a dynamic QoS routing model was proposed. To ensure the provision of the best services, it assigns different levels of privileges to different users, and uses interrupt mechanism to dynamically reconfigure QoS setting according to the user demands.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researches have been done on dynamically allocating network resources to optimize the resource supply for routing services. In (Tansupasiri et al, 2006), a dynamic QoS routing model was proposed. To ensure the provision of the best services, it assigns different levels of privileges to different users, and uses interrupt mechanism to dynamically reconfigure QoS setting according to the user demands.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When providing services, (Tansupasiri et al, 2006;Mellouk et al, 2011) just considered the user's utility, while (Gu and Zhang, 2011;Balasubramaniam et al, 2009;Peculea et al, 2010) just considered the ISP's utility. In addition, all the above works made decisions to allocate resources and assemble functions for services mainly according to the local information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user (i.e. network administrator) defines the mapping function of DSCP fields into Ti, Di and Ri preference level indicators, according to the agreed Service-level Agreement (SLA), in a similar manner as Per-Hop Behaviour (PHB) is defined in the DiffServ architecture [10], [11]. We have chosen the following mapping [1]:…”
Section: Qos-aware Dynamic Map Selection While Retaining the Balance ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anticipating the vast volumes of data generated, it includes mechanisms for moving intelligence and capabilities for IoT such as filtering, pattern recognition, machine learning, and decision-making to enable distributed and decentralized processing of the information, either locally or remotely in the server center [3]. In [17], it is dynamically classified as the network resources by the characteristics of data flow. Most of them identify the transmission priority of the packet before the packets are sent to the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of cross-layer design, a special algorithm is used to dynamically select the parameters of each layer, such as transmission power of the physical layer, avoidance time of the MAC layer, and variable transmission rate range of the network layer [16]. In [17], it is dynamically classified as the network resources by the characteristics of data flow. These researches have achieved good results; however, all these are under the conditions that the link state can meet the QoS parameters required for applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%