2014
DOI: 10.5139/ijass.2014.15.1.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Acoustic Liner for Fan Noise Reduction in Modern Turbofan Engines

Abstract: With the increase in global air travel, aircraft noise has become a major public issue. In modern aircraft engines, only a small proportion of the air that passes through the whole engine actually goes through the core of the engine, the rest passes around it down the bypass duct. A successful method of reducing noise further, even in ultra-high bypass ratio engines, is to absorb the sound created within the engine. Acoustically absorbent material or acoustic liners have desirable acoustic attenuation properti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“… "--" or 0 point  criteria fulfilment much worse than with the SHR-Liner  "-" or 1 points  criteria fulfilment worse than with the SHR-Liner  "o" or 2 points  criteria fulfilment as good as with the SHR-Liner  "+" or 3 points  criteria fulfilment better than with the SHR-Liner  "++" or 4 points  criteria fulfilment much better than with the SHR-Liner Figure 5 shows the degree of criteria fulfilment , by the FHR-and PR-Liner in comparison to the reference liner (SHR-Liner). The selection of the degree of implementation in Figure 5 was made by information from  the state of the art [27], [28], [29],  investigations on the principles of action [03], [18],  analyses of system safety and aspects of integration in the aero engine [15], [30]  research of technical literature [31], [32], [33] and  information exchange of project partners from different technical disciplines.…”
Section: Concept Ratingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… "--" or 0 point  criteria fulfilment much worse than with the SHR-Liner  "-" or 1 points  criteria fulfilment worse than with the SHR-Liner  "o" or 2 points  criteria fulfilment as good as with the SHR-Liner  "+" or 3 points  criteria fulfilment better than with the SHR-Liner  "++" or 4 points  criteria fulfilment much better than with the SHR-Liner Figure 5 shows the degree of criteria fulfilment , by the FHR-and PR-Liner in comparison to the reference liner (SHR-Liner). The selection of the degree of implementation in Figure 5 was made by information from  the state of the art [27], [28], [29],  investigations on the principles of action [03], [18],  analyses of system safety and aspects of integration in the aero engine [15], [30]  research of technical literature [31], [32], [33] and  information exchange of project partners from different technical disciplines.…”
Section: Concept Ratingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p(x, ϑ) satisfies the weak equation (2). The minimization is over the physical domain of ξ which is omitted for simplicity.…”
Section: The Stochastic Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aircraft noise emissions reduction has become a driving factor for competitive aircraft design, as political and environmental laws have become more firm. [1][2][3][4] Noise reduction techniques can be broadly classified as passive and active methods. Passive control involves reducing the radiated noise by energy absorption, while the active method involves reducing source strength or modifying acoustic field in the duct to obtain noise reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%