2010
DOI: 10.1097/nne.0b013e3181c42133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a Writing Group to Promote Faculty Scholarship

Abstract: Writing productivity is an essential component of scholarship. Barriers to writing include intrapersonal characteristics, faculty role complexity, and time constraints. Writing groups can increase faculty members' writing, contributing to dissemination of nursing knowledge and advancement of professional nursing. The authors discuss the structure and processes of a writing group that can be adapted by faculty interested in using comentoring to increase their scholarship.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social workers were strongly encouraged to attend the launch of the Writing Series Project introductory workshop, which was held as a district-wide continuing education activity attended by 45 social workers. However, group attendance was voluntary, as writing groups should comprise of voluntary participants (Ferguson, 2009) who provide mutual mentorship and reciprocity (Fouché & Lunt, 2009;Houfek et al, 2010;Lee & Boud, 2003). In line with Hislop, Murray, and Newton (2008), we provided a space for practitioners to develop writing support networks and overcome barriers to writing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Social workers were strongly encouraged to attend the launch of the Writing Series Project introductory workshop, which was held as a district-wide continuing education activity attended by 45 social workers. However, group attendance was voluntary, as writing groups should comprise of voluntary participants (Ferguson, 2009) who provide mutual mentorship and reciprocity (Fouché & Lunt, 2009;Houfek et al, 2010;Lee & Boud, 2003). In line with Hislop, Murray, and Newton (2008), we provided a space for practitioners to develop writing support networks and overcome barriers to writing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is important because small group size is useful in developing rapport and trust (Ferguson, 2009). Further, writing groups should provide members with opportunities to interact with their peers and problem-solve writing challenges together (Ferguson, 2009;Houfek et al, 2010). Discussion of, and agreement on, group structure, process, and methods, and group process guidelines is useful (Houfek et al, 2010) and our practitioners were encouraged to set optimistic and realistic goals (McCleary, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A literature review was performed by looking at structure, process, and outcomes for writing groups. Unlike other writing groups described in the literature [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] in which the group members provided peer support for fellow authors working on individual papers, the groups described here work collaboratively on jointly authored manuscripts. This group approach is beneficial to nonacademic practitioners who have limited time and publication experience.…”
Section: What Did We Learn?mentioning
confidence: 99%