2015
DOI: 10.1080/17404622.2015.1033436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a Thematic Analysis of Literature to Survey Subfields within Communication Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed framework has been developed based on an extensive and systematic review of the literature on critical literacy and its development and the classroom practices of critical literacy in the context of language learning (Novianti et al, 2020). To situate the framework into the specific EFL setting, we reviewed classroom practices of critical literacy in EFL contexts reported in peer-reviewed journal articles within the period of 2012 to 2019 and analyzed them thematically (Garner & Ragland, 2015;Guest et al, 2012). Subsequently, qualitative metaanalysis (Schreiber et al, 1997;Timulak, 2009) was applied in our attempt to contribute to the existing knowledge and theories of critical literacy based on our analysis of the practices.…”
Section: Methods Of Framework Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed framework has been developed based on an extensive and systematic review of the literature on critical literacy and its development and the classroom practices of critical literacy in the context of language learning (Novianti et al, 2020). To situate the framework into the specific EFL setting, we reviewed classroom practices of critical literacy in EFL contexts reported in peer-reviewed journal articles within the period of 2012 to 2019 and analyzed them thematically (Garner & Ragland, 2015;Guest et al, 2012). Subsequently, qualitative metaanalysis (Schreiber et al, 1997;Timulak, 2009) was applied in our attempt to contribute to the existing knowledge and theories of critical literacy based on our analysis of the practices.…”
Section: Methods Of Framework Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%