2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a sub-pixel mapping model to improve the accuracy of landscape pattern indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D(X, F ) represents the closeness of X to input F and is used to denote the minimum difference between the fraction values of the result and input fraction values. D(X, F ) is based on the area constraints in (2) and is formulated as…”
Section: Fraction Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D(X, F ) represents the closeness of X to input F and is used to denote the minimum difference between the fraction values of the result and input fraction values. D(X, F ) is based on the area constraints in (2) and is formulated as…”
Section: Fraction Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches have achieved relatively satisfactory performance in several applications, such as waterline mapping [29], urban tree identification [13], enhancement of the landscape pattern index [30], land-cover change detection [31], urban building extraction [32], lake area estimation [33], and floodplain inundation mapping [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, the subpixel mapping technique was proposed to determine the subpixel location of each class or endmember based on the fractional abundances [10][11][12][13][14][15]. In recent years, subpixel mapping has been applied in many practical applications, including land-cover change detection [16], waterline mapping [17], and landscape pattern indices calculation [18]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%