2013
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a social capital framework to enhance measurement of the nursing work environment

Abstract: Social capital measurement of the nurse work environment has the potential to provide managers with an enhanced set of tools for building productive capacity in health-care organisations and achieving desired outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCON Cronbach's alpha was 0.92 in Sheingold and Sheingold () and 0.90 in the present study. The reliability coefficient of the subscales ranged from 0.72 to 0.85 in the present study.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…The SCON Cronbach's alpha was 0.92 in Sheingold and Sheingold () and 0.90 in the present study. The reliability coefficient of the subscales ranged from 0.72 to 0.85 in the present study.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…This instrument consists of 36 items categorized into five subscales: internal trust and solidarity (12 items), external trust and solidarity (9 items), participation and empowerment (7 items), conflict (5 items), and social cohesion with coworkers (3 items). For the SCON, Cronbach's ⍺ was .92 in Sheingold and Sheingold [17] and .90 in the present study. The reliability coefficients of the subscales ranged from .75 to .88 in the present study.…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Social capital was measured using the Social Capital Outcomes for Nurses (SCON) developed by Sheingold and Sheingold [17] and evaluated for validity and reliability for use with nurses by Shin and Lee [13]. It was used after obtaining permission via e-mail from Shin and Lee [13], who translated the SCON.…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eight-subscale solution accounted for 68.49% of the overall variance, and was found to be internally consistent (overall Cronbach’s α = 0.87). The subscales were renamed based on the conceptual meanings of the items [34] and comprised the following: system and policy; fringe benefits; work itself; working relationship; professional development; recognition; working environment; and remuneration, and accounted for 14.29%, 10.6%, 9.6%, 8.3%, 7.8%, 7.4%, 6.1%, and 4.6% of the overall variance, respectively. The Cronbach’s αs within individual subscales ranged from 0.80 to 0.91.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%