2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a multigene phylogenetic analysis to assess generic delineation and character evolution in Verrucariaceae (Verrucariales, Ascomycota)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
161
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
8
161
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All isolates were subjected to a multi-gene analysis of seven genes including Apn2, EF1-α, CAL, HIS, FG1093, ACT and TUB regions, excluding the ITS region from the combined analysis. Individual datasets were tested for congruency using the 70 % reciprocal bootstrap (BS) threshold method as described by Gueidan et al (2007). Evolutionary models for phylogenetic analyses were selected independently for each locus using MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander 2004) under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) implemented in both PAUP v.4.and MrBayes v3.…”
Section: Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All isolates were subjected to a multi-gene analysis of seven genes including Apn2, EF1-α, CAL, HIS, FG1093, ACT and TUB regions, excluding the ITS region from the combined analysis. Individual datasets were tested for congruency using the 70 % reciprocal bootstrap (BS) threshold method as described by Gueidan et al (2007). Evolutionary models for phylogenetic analyses were selected independently for each locus using MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander 2004) under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) implemented in both PAUP v.4.and MrBayes v3.…”
Section: Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These and other studies have provided strong evidence that many commonly used morphological and anatomical characters traditionally utilized to classify lichenized fungal taxa often are poor predictors of monophyletic groups. By contrast, traits traditionally considered less important in taxonomy are often better indicators of phylogenetic relationships in lichens Blanco et al, 2006;Gueidan et al, 2007;Schmitt et al, 2009a;Rivas-Plata et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the study of character evolution has dramatically increased our knowledge of how morphological and ecological traits evolve in lichens, and how these reflect phylogenetic relationships (Blanco et al, 2006;Gueidan et al, 2007;Ekman et al, 2008;Schmitt et al, 2009a;Muggia et al, 2011). In the Collemataceae, many of the easily observable and ecologically significant traits traditionally used for taxon circumscription are clearly not characterizing monophyletic groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recientes estudios moleculares han modificado sustancialmente la nomenclatura de algunos géneros tales como Aspicilia, Caloplaca, Melanelia, Phaeosporobolus, Verrucaria y Xanthoria (Arup et al 2013, Divakar et al 2012, Ertz et al 2013, Gueidan et al 2007, Sohrabi et al 2013a. Hemos considerado estas actualizaciones, pero mantenemos entre paréntesis la combinación anterior.…”
Section: Materiales Y Métodosunclassified