2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00508-008-0953-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a laryngeal tube during cardiac arrest reduces "no flow time" in a manikin study: a comparison between laryngeal tube and endotracheal tube

Abstract: With regard to the guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council, we are convinced that during cardiac arrest supraglottic airway devices should be used by emergency personnel unfamiliar with endotracheal intubation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…104 One study compared survival in cardiac arrests managed with a laryngeal mask airway with an historical control group of cardiac arrests managed with a tracheal tube and found that ROSC was significantly higher in the study period (61% versus 36%) (LOE 3). 105 Eight manikin studies with simulated cardiac arrest (LOE 5) 89,90,96,[112][113][114][115][116] and 8 manikin studies without simulated cardiac arrest showed that successful insertion rates and/or time to insertion or to ventilation for a variety of supraglottic airway devices were as good, or better than, for the tracheal tube (LOE 5). [117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124] Nine studies documented that when a supraglottic airway device is used as a rescue airway after failed tracheal intubation, most patients can be ventilated successfully with the supraglottic airway device (LOE 2 98,99,103 ; LOE 3 [125][126][127][128] ; LOE 5 107,129 ).…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…104 One study compared survival in cardiac arrests managed with a laryngeal mask airway with an historical control group of cardiac arrests managed with a tracheal tube and found that ROSC was significantly higher in the study period (61% versus 36%) (LOE 3). 105 Eight manikin studies with simulated cardiac arrest (LOE 5) 89,90,96,[112][113][114][115][116] and 8 manikin studies without simulated cardiac arrest showed that successful insertion rates and/or time to insertion or to ventilation for a variety of supraglottic airway devices were as good, or better than, for the tracheal tube (LOE 5). [117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124] Nine studies documented that when a supraglottic airway device is used as a rescue airway after failed tracheal intubation, most patients can be ventilated successfully with the supraglottic airway device (LOE 2 98,99,103 ; LOE 3 [125][126][127][128] ; LOE 5 107,129 ).…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…108,117 Three manikin studies comparing a supraglottic airway device with the tracheal tube during ongoing chest compressions demonstrated decreased time to intubation with the supraglottic airway device, as well as reduced no flow time (LOE 5). 96,112,115 One nonrandomized manikin study found that chest compressions caused only a minor increase in time to tracheal intubation but not to supraglottic airway device insertion (LOE 5). 114 …”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some publications have described the influence of the use of a LT on NFT in manikin studies [33][34][35].Any decrease in NFT, ideally with improved ventilation, might improve survival after cardiac arrest. The objective of this manikin study was to compare the effects of the use of a LT and BMV for ventilation on NFT in a simulated, prospective, randomized tworescuer BLS model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Several studies reported that SADs are effective and can be successfully used to maintain the airway, while one study could not find any difference regarding success rate or duration of insertion. [3][4][5] Although endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion was found to be associated with higher survival rate and neurological outcome, the incidence of unrecognized oesophageal or endobronchial intubation is frequent and is associated with a high mortality rate. [6][7][8] Airway management is a controversial issue in pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).…”
Section: Comparison Of Classical Laryngeal Mask I Gel and Tracheal Imentioning
confidence: 99%