2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a land use regression model with machine learning to estimate ground level PM2.5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, studies on PM 2.5 mainly focus on its source and composition (Martuzevicius et al, 2004;Xu et al, 2014), spatio-temporal distribution (Lu et al, 2017;Mi et al, 2020) and concentration prediction (Mao et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2018a;Zhang et al, 2018;Stafoggia et al, 2019;Wong et al, 2021) to seek measures to reduce the negative effects of PM 2.5 by clarifying its chemical composition and sources. At the same time, many factors have been proved to have a certain influence on PM 2.5 concentration.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, studies on PM 2.5 mainly focus on its source and composition (Martuzevicius et al, 2004;Xu et al, 2014), spatio-temporal distribution (Lu et al, 2017;Mi et al, 2020) and concentration prediction (Mao et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2018a;Zhang et al, 2018;Stafoggia et al, 2019;Wong et al, 2021) to seek measures to reduce the negative effects of PM 2.5 by clarifying its chemical composition and sources. At the same time, many factors have been proved to have a certain influence on PM 2.5 concentration.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the Environment Resource Datasets 43 are publicly available from open government data. This dataset was obtained by the Environmental Protection Administration of Taiwan, which determined ambient pollutants and temperatures at 76 monitoring stations across Taiwan, from 1993 to 2013.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were selected based on weak correlations (Pearson's correlation coefficients <0.3) of target pollutants with ten other monitored air pollutants: sulfur dioxide (SO2); ozone (O3); carbon monoxide (CO); carbon dioxide (CO2); nitrogen oxides (NOX); nitrogen monoxide (NO); nitrogen dioxide (NO2); particulate matter <10 μm in size (PM10); particulate matter <2.5 μm in size (PM2.5); and methane (CH4) (Supplementary Table S1). Daily air quality data were collected at 76 monitoring stations from July 1, 1993, to December 31, 2013, and maintained by the EPA 43 .…”
Section: Exposure Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatiotemporal LUR model was a hybrid two-stage model integrating a static LUR model and a multiple linear-regression-based meteorological factor regression (MFR) model for more accurate spatiotemporal predictions [41]. Finally, an LUR model was integrated with machine learning algorithms to improve the prediction accuracy, where the linear relationships between air pollutants and explanatory variables are replaced by nonlinear relationships explored by machine learning [15,16]. For instance, non-parametric LUR models were developed with the support of a random forest model and a generalized additive model for predicting spatial distributions of ambient total particulate concentrations [42], and additive regression smoother-based LUR models were developed for investigating agglomeration and infrastructure effects on air pollutants [43].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications and advantages of LUR models have been reviewed in the next section. In recent years, a series of new models have been developed based on LUR to improve prediction capacity, such as dimensionality reduction for explanatory variables [13], spatiotemporal LUR modelling [14] and the integration of LUR and machine learning algorithms [15,16], as reviewed in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%