Proceedings Seventh IEEE International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastucture for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE
DOI: 10.1109/enabl.1998.725671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a groupware space for distributed requirements engineering

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, several distances may be at play in co-located cross-functional teams with a product owner from a different organisational unit and with an RE background; short geographical, but long organisational and cognitive distances between the product owner and other team members. Awareness of distance and their impact could support management in optimising organisations [37], training efforts, and selected methods [36] and tools [9,13,18,32,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, several distances may be at play in co-located cross-functional teams with a product owner from a different organisational unit and with an RE background; short geographical, but long organisational and cognitive distances between the product owner and other team members. Awareness of distance and their impact could support management in optimising organisations [37], training efforts, and selected methods [36] and tools [9,13,18,32,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in cases where client-specific knowledge was crucial face-to-face collaboration was required for adequate knowledge transfer of domain knowledge and for requirements analysis and specification [15]. Tools for enhancing distributed group communication have been suggested for collaborative RE activities such as requirement negotiation and requirements traceability towards goals and design artefacts [18]. Calefato et al found that computer-based communication provided better support for elicitation than for negotiation, and suggest that the general preference for face-to-face communication might be explained by this weakness of computer-based negotiations [9].…”
Section: Distance Between Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briggs and Gruenbacher, 2002;Davison, 2000;Elfvengren et al, 2003) and some also in distributed settings (Ocker et al, 1995-96;Herlea and Greenberg, 1998). GSS are said to be very adaptable to this problem environment, but the integration of the GSS and software engineering process has been seen as a hindering factor in the dissemination of GSS in the industry.…”
Section: The Development Of Gss Has Started Already In the Late 1980'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This covers everything from basic support tools such as discussion boards and video conferencing to generic meeting tools like mind mapping and idea capture software, all the way through to virtual collaboration environments specifically designed groups sessions such as developed by TeamWave [27] and GroupSystems [63].…”
Section: Tool Support For Requirements Elicitationmentioning
confidence: 99%