2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a global sensitivity analysis to estimate the appropriate length of calibration period in the presence of high hydrological model uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morbidelli et al(2021) demonstrated that lower resolution affected the trend of extreme rainfall prediction. By analyzing appropriate calibration data lengths in three hydrological models(GR4J, IHACRES, and Sacramento models) for three dam catchments in Korea, Shin & Jung(2022) found that calibration data lengths of more than 8 years yielded relatively stable simulation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morbidelli et al(2021) demonstrated that lower resolution affected the trend of extreme rainfall prediction. By analyzing appropriate calibration data lengths in three hydrological models(GR4J, IHACRES, and Sacramento models) for three dam catchments in Korea, Shin & Jung(2022) found that calibration data lengths of more than 8 years yielded relatively stable simulation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have been conducted to understand the uncertainty caused by the selection of the calibration period [24,25]. However, most of these studies do not consider the variety of evaluation metrics used for quantification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive sensitivity analysis, as provided by global methods such as Sobol indices, is essential for a precise understanding of a model (Saltelli et al, 2008;Saltelli, 2013). It can help to improve parameter calibration efficiency and avoid overparameterization (e.g., Shin and Jung, 2022;Tang et al, 2007a, b). It is also an efficient tool to better understand the model structure (Saltelli et al, 2008), its uncertainties (e.g., Pheulpin et al, 2022) and the dominant processes under various conditions (e.g., Huang et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%