2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a functional linguistics metalanguage to support academic language development in the English Language Arts

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 is an example of how we are helping children begin to see patterns in these ways authors use language (see Moore & Schleppegrell 2014, for more on this). We saw that when authors tell attitudes, they typically use BEING or SENSING processes.…”
Section: Supporting Learning Through Grammatical Metalanguagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 is an example of how we are helping children begin to see patterns in these ways authors use language (see Moore & Schleppegrell 2014, for more on this). We saw that when authors tell attitudes, they typically use BEING or SENSING processes.…”
Section: Supporting Learning Through Grammatical Metalanguagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The course content would further examine second language acquisition theory and principles through the lens of additive biliteracy and linguistic constructs with both languages. Candidates would explore how the two languages interact with one another in distinct ways with regard to discourse patterns and writing structures, as well as metalinguistic patterns with bilingual students (Beeman & Urow, 2013;Moore & Schleppegrell, 2014).…”
Section: Discussion and Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniquely, middle level learners are also advantaged with having amplified imaginations and higher levels of abstract thinking (Joseph, 2010). For dual language learning, middle level students' intellectual development and broad spectrum of thinking serves to fundamentally support biliteracy development in ways that differ from elementary school settings (Molle, Sato, Boals, & Hedgspeth, 2015;Moore & Schleppegrell, 2014). With this in mind, middle level dual language teachers can tap into their students' abstract, intellectual strengths to solidify collaboration among culturally and linguistically diverse students (Cummins, 2014;Klassen & Krawchuk, 2009).…”
Section: Theoretical Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most modern linguistics is descriptive, because it attempts to describe what people actually say, not what people should say [10]. It describes language in all its aspects, but does not prescribe rules of 'correctness'.…”
Section: The Differences Between Modern Linguistics and Traditional Gmentioning
confidence: 99%