“…In fact, it was Tsai and Johnson who proposed that base discrimination is determined by the relative magnitudes of the forward and reverse rates of the prechemistry conformational change (fingers closing) compared to the rate of the chemical step that completely changed the concept prevailing at the time concerning base selectivity . Our studies of RB69pol have shown that nucleotide insertion efficiency and base selectivity are determined by a number of factors, including interbase HBs, minor groove HBs, base stacking, the geometry of the base pair as it fits into the NBP, conformational changes, and the partitioning of the primer terminus between the pol and exo subdomains. ,,,,− Subsequently, we showed that the results obtained by Tsai and Johnson also applied to RB69pol . In addition to the results obtained from kinetic and structural studies, molecular dynamics simulation approaches have further enhanced our understanding of conformational dynamics of the polymerase-catalyzed nucleotidyl transfer reaction that results in base selectivity. , We discuss each of them in turn in the following sections.…”