2016
DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1247932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a divided-attention stepping accuracy task to improve balance and functional outcomes in an individual with incomplete spinal cord injury: A case report

Abstract: A spinal cord injury (SCI) frequently results in impaired balance, endurance, and strength with subsequent limitations in functional mobility and community participation. The purpose of this case report was to implement a training program for an individual with a chronic incomplete SCI using a novel divided-attention stepping accuracy task (DASAT) to determine if improvements could be made in impairments, activities, and participation. The client was a 51-year-old male with a motor incomplete C4 SCI sustained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Virtual realitybased balance training has also been shown to improve lower extremity strength in individuals with iSCI/D when five muscle groups were tested manually (16,17). A case study examining the effects of a divided attention stepping task, however, did not find any effects on lower extremity strength following training, but this testing was done with a dynamometer on three muscle groups (18). Our results may differ from these findings for several reasons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Virtual realitybased balance training has also been shown to improve lower extremity strength in individuals with iSCI/D when five muscle groups were tested manually (16,17). A case study examining the effects of a divided attention stepping task, however, did not find any effects on lower extremity strength following training, but this testing was done with a dynamometer on three muscle groups (18). Our results may differ from these findings for several reasons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…On the FES-I, mean (standard deviation) changes scores were −4.4 (6.1) for the PBT group and −3.7 (5.0) for the CIBT group. There were no significant group-by-time or group effects (F (1,18) = 0.07, p = 0.80, F (1,18) = 2.30, p = 0.15, respectively), but there was a significant effect for time (F (1,18) = 10.44, p = 0.010). One participant out of 10 from the PBT and two out of 10 from the CIBT group moved below the cut-off score of 22 points; there was no difference between groups with respect to the proportion of participants who moved below the cut-off point (χ 2 = 0.39, p = 0.53).…”
Section: Secondary Outcomes: Balance Strength Gait and Self-report Measuresmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations