2009
DOI: 10.1080/07317130802520229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a Database as an Assessment Reporting Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nomological validity requires the whole domain of the construct to be sufficiently captured in the measurement items, where the construct and their relationships to each other are tested in a broad variety of settings [61]. Hence, reusing existing research models will assist in the interpretation of results and significantly save time as opposed to creating entirely new models because the model has been used and the results can be compared [62].…”
Section: Justification For Selecting the Dandm Is Success Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nomological validity requires the whole domain of the construct to be sufficiently captured in the measurement items, where the construct and their relationships to each other are tested in a broad variety of settings [61]. Hence, reusing existing research models will assist in the interpretation of results and significantly save time as opposed to creating entirely new models because the model has been used and the results can be compared [62].…”
Section: Justification For Selecting the Dandm Is Success Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Librarians who do not have such access, however, were able to build similar applications with non-proprietary, or Open Source, solutions, notably MySQL and Google Sheets (the equivalent of Excel) (Breeding, 2007;Gardner & Pinfield, 2001;Simon, 2015). At the other end of the proprietary spectrum, some librarians developed solutions using the more robust (and expensive) Microsoft SQL Server database management system (Greene, 2008;Parrish, Schyndel, & Erdman, 2009).…”
Section: Data Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%