2020
DOI: 10.1111/fog.12502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using a biophysical model to investigate connectivity between spawning grounds and nursery areas of King George whiting (Sillaginodes punctatus: Perciformes) in South Australia’s gulfs

Abstract: Many demersal marine fish species depend on a dispersive larval stage that connects geographically discrete sub-populations. Understanding connectivity between these sub-populations is necessary to determine stock structure, which identifies the appropriate spatial scale for fishery management. Such connectivity is poorly understood for King George whiting (Sillaginodes punctatus; Perciformes) in South Australia's gulf system, even though spawning grounds and nursery areas are ad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(173 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternate approach is to simulate dispersal using biophysical models (Swearer et al 2019). The biological component of these models describes the ontogenetic development of the larvae, which can be retrospectively determined from the otolith microstructure of settled juveniles (i.e., spawn date, growth rate, settlement date) (Rogers et al 2021;Vaz et al 2019). Furthermore, the simulated patterns of larval dispersal can be compared to the relationships identified from otolith biomarkers to assess model predictions and best interpret connectivity.…”
Section: Natal Origin and Estuarine And Coastal Nursery Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternate approach is to simulate dispersal using biophysical models (Swearer et al 2019). The biological component of these models describes the ontogenetic development of the larvae, which can be retrospectively determined from the otolith microstructure of settled juveniles (i.e., spawn date, growth rate, settlement date) (Rogers et al 2021;Vaz et al 2019). Furthermore, the simulated patterns of larval dispersal can be compared to the relationships identified from otolith biomarkers to assess model predictions and best interpret connectivity.…”
Section: Natal Origin and Estuarine And Coastal Nursery Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given interannual variability in the strength of recruitment for some of the key harvested species in South Australia (e.g. King George whiting; Rogers et al., 2021), and the influence of inter‐annual weather patterns such as El Niño Southern Oscillation events (noting that 2022–2023 was a La Niña period), ongoing monitoring at this location will be especially important to ensure that our low estimate of biomass enhancement is not misleading. Other possible explanations for low juvenile fish abundance at the Glenelg reef are (1) differences in the physical properties of the systems, with Glenelg located in an open‐water gulf while Dromana and Margaret are situated in a semi‐enclosed protected bay and (2) a greater extent of alternative structured habitat such as seagrass in Gulf St. Vincent, compared to the patchy and much reduced extent of seagrass historically in Port Phillip Bay (Connolly et al., 2018), further supporting the above statement that the production at Glenelg may not be habitat limited and is instead subject to other bottlenecks, such as reduced egg supply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e.g. King George whiting;Rogers et al, 2021), and the influence of inter-annual weather patterns such as El Niño Southern Oscillation events (noting that 2022-2023 was a La Niña period), ongoing monitoring at this location will be especially important to ensure that our low estimate of biomass enhancement is not misleading. Other possible explanations for low juvenile fish abundance at the Glenelg reef are (1) differences in the physical properties of the systems, with Glenelg located in an open-water gulf while Dromana and Margaret are situated in a semi-enclosed protected bay and (2) a greater extent of alternative structured habitat such as seagrass in Gulf St.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, even with A. butcheri estuary‐hopping to adjacent locations, long distance movement would be required for fish to migrate between both South Australian gulfs. Additional sampling along the coastline between Tumby Bay and Gulf St Vincent may be needed to provide greater insight into their connectivity and gene flow associated with regional oceanographic conditions and predicted residual currents between both South Australian gulfs (Rogers et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%