2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using 3D laser scanning for estimating the capacity of corroded steel bridge girders: Experiments, computations and analytical solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although innovative techniques such as 3D laser scanning (J. Liu et al, 2023;Tzortzinis et al, 2022), dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs) (Zhu et al, 2019), and Bayesian updating methods combined with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques (M.-C. Chen et al, 2019) have been introduced for quality inspection and crack prediction; they predominantly focus on postproduction evaluations and monitoring, overlooking risk prevention and control during the production phase. This oversight underscores the urgent need for systematic identification, assessment, and management of quality risks in the production of prefabricated steel structural components, which is crucial for enhancing quality management and ensuring safety in construction and engineering projects.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although innovative techniques such as 3D laser scanning (J. Liu et al, 2023;Tzortzinis et al, 2022), dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs) (Zhu et al, 2019), and Bayesian updating methods combined with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques (M.-C. Chen et al, 2019) have been introduced for quality inspection and crack prediction; they predominantly focus on postproduction evaluations and monitoring, overlooking risk prevention and control during the production phase. This oversight underscores the urgent need for systematic identification, assessment, and management of quality risks in the production of prefabricated steel structural components, which is crucial for enhancing quality management and ensuring safety in construction and engineering projects.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a noticeable gap in identifying and assessing potential risks during the production process. Although innovative techniques such as 3D laser scanning [27], dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs) [28], and Bayesian updating methods combined with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques [29] have been introduced for quality inspection and crack prediction, they predominantly focus on postproduction evaluations and monitoring, overlooking risk prevention and control during the production phase. This oversight underscores the urgent need for systematic identification, assessment, and management of quality risks in the production of prefabricated steel structural components, which is crucial for enhancing quality management and ensuring safety in construction and engineering projects.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, each knockdown factor is only valid for a unique structure/loading combination and is therefore difficult to generalize to other kinds of structures and applications. It has been shown that knowing accurately a structure’s initial geometry enables the accurate prediction of the buckling event [8,9]. However, in many applications, measuring the shape of a structure can be expensive and in some cases it is impossible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%